1 Corinthians 6:1
Failure to resolve personal disputes
The topic of judgment continued as Paul shifted
to another disorder afflicting the Corinthian church. The same laxity in
dealing with the immoral brother was found in cases of personal disputes
between members which the church refused to adjudicate. It was yet another
manifestation of the divisive spirit which racked the congregation.
With the introductory phrase “Do you not know,”
Paul pointed toward certain truths which should have prevented the problem in
the first place. The phrase recurs six times in this chapter alone. (Outside
this letter this construction appears only three other times in the NT.) Paul
had used it before (1Co_3:16; 1Co_5:6) and would subsequently use it again (1Co_9:13, 1Co_9:24)
to the same effect. The implication that they should have known these things
must have painfully hit home to a church enamored with its own wisdom and
knowledge. This is speaking of a problem between two Christians. “Dare”: Suing another
believer in a secular law court is a daring act of disobedience because of its
implications related to all sin – the displeasure of God.
“Having
a matter against another”: The phrase in Greek was commonly used of a lawsuit
(“go to law”).
“Unjust”:
not meaning their moral character, but to their unsaved spiritual condition.
The
worldly court is no place to settle a dispute between two Christians. It is a
sad situation that they had a dispute serious enough to have to be decided by
someone else other than the two of them. It is unthinkable to turn it over to a
world court. Believers are to settle all issues between themselves within the
church. The fear of the Lord would not be part of the decision in a world
court.
Paul’s
chagrin about this issue was great, not only because it further divided the
church, but also because it hindered the work of God among the non-Christians
in Corinth (cf. 1Co_10:32). Those
related by faith needed to settle their disputes like brothers, not adversaries
(cf. Gen_13:7-9).
1 Corinthians 6:2
The first of six do you not know phrases
in this chapter (cf. 1Co_6:3, 1Co_6:9, 1Co_6:15-16,
1Co_6:19) concerned the role of saints
in judging (cf. Joh_5:22; Rev_3:21). “Judge the world”: Because Christians will
assist Christ to judge the world in the millennial kingdom (Rev 2:26-27; 3:21;
Dan. 7:22), they are more than qualified with the truth, the Spirit, the gifts,
and the resources they presently have in Him to settle small matters that come
up among themselves in this present life.
Jesus
will be like what we think of the Supreme Court today, and we Christians will
be like the lower court under His jurisdiction. We must learn to get along with
our brothers and sisters in Christ. If there is something that seemingly is
difficult to decide, then other impartial Christians should decide the matter
with the Bible as the basis of the verdict. The Bible says that we will reign
with Jesus. Those ruling have to judge. You can, also, see how a brother or
sister in Christ who is familiar with God's teaching would be better able to
come to a satisfactory Biblical verdict.
Paul had probably taught this doctrine in Corinth
in the course of his founding the church there, since he cited it as an
indisputable proposition.
1 Corinthians 6:3
Since they were going to judge supernatural
beings (the fallen angels, 2Pe_2:4;
Jud_1:6), surely they should handle
mundane matters satisfactorily. “Judge Angels”: The Greek word can mean “rule or
govern.” Since the Lord Himself will judge fallen angels (2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6),
it is likely this means we will have some rule in eternity over holy angels.
Since
angels are “ministering spirits” to serve the saints (Heb 1:14), it seems
reasonable that they will serve us in glory.
1 Corinthians 6:4
The form of the Greek word (kāthizete, appoint) may be a
statement (indicative) or a command (imper.). The NIV has taken it as a
command, making the difficult phrase men of little account refer to
those in the church not too highly esteemed for their “wisdom”; but Paul
considered them more than adequate for the task.
“Appoint”
may be indicative which seems more likely in view of 1Co_6:5. If so, the participle translated “men of little
account” would be better rendered “men who have no standing” in the church,
that is, non-Christians. The sad refrain of 1Co_6:1
to which Paul would refer yet a third time in 1Co_6:6
was thus heard again. This
is a difficult verse to translate, as suggested by the widely varying English
renderings. But the basic meaning is clear: when Christians have earthly
quarrels and disputes among themselves, it is inconceivable that they would
turn to those least qualified (unbelievers) to resolve the matter.
The
most legally untrained believers, (least esteemed) who know the Word of God and
are obedient to the Spirit, are far more competent to settle disagreements
between believers than the most experienced unbeliever, void of God’s truth and
Spirit.
1 Corinthians 6:5-6
No doubt the statement in 1Co_6:5 reddened some of the wise
Corinthians’ faces. Now
Paul is saying, can't you see how silly this is? What he is trying to make them
realize, is that Christians should sit down together and talk it out, with a
third party, if necessary. Pray together and let God decide the outcome. Certainly a part of Paul’s concern in this issue was the harmful
effect such legal wrangling would have on the cause of the gospel in Corinth (1Co_9:23). Paul is saying that to go before a civil court
to settle an argument between two Christians, gives Christianity a black eye.
If Jesus Christ is King of Peace, why is there this problem too difficult to
settle?
Such
conduct as suing a fellow believer is not only a sinful shame, but a complete
failure to act obediently and righteously.
Christians
who take fellow Christians to court suffer moral defeat and spiritual loss even
before the case is heard, and they become subject to divine chastening.
Hebrews
12:3 "For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against
himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds."
Such lawsuits certainly did not glorify God (1Co_10:31-33).
1 Corinthians 6:7-8
Because their greed dishonored God, Paul
concluded that the important issue was lost before the case had begun. “Why … not … take
wrong”: The implied answer is because of the shameful sin (v.5), and the moral
defeat (v.8) that result from selfishness, a willingness to discredit God, His
wisdom, power, and sovereign purpose, and to harm the church and the testimony
of Christ’s gospel.
“Defrauded”:
Christians have no right to insist on legal recourse in a public court. It is
far better to trust God’s sovereign purposes in trouble and lose financially,
than to be disobedient and suffer spiritually.
Jesus
taught if someone sued you for your coat; give them your cloke also. He, also
said to turn the other cheek, if someone slapped you on one cheek. He taught
give to him that asks of you. Where have they sidetracked His teaching
"forgive him that asks of you"? We know that Jesus taught that
vengeance was His. We are to return good for the evil done unto us. These
things are what make us a Christian. We are to kill them with kindness. What if
you are the loser? It will just store up forgiveness for you in heaven, if you
forgive the wrong he has done unto you.
He therefore said that mundane loss was
preferable to the spiritual loss which the lawsuits produced. Paul is shaming them
here. It is bad to do wrong to someone of the world, but it is terrible to do
wrong to a brother in Christ.
He
is referring to those who sue their brothers in Christ being as guilty of the
same misconduct they are suing to rectify. As it was, the
Corinthian lawsuits seemed not to have been so much a matter of redressing
wrong or seeing justice served as a means for personal gratification at the
expense of fellow believers. This was “body life” at its worst!
In
these next two verses this catalog of sins, though not exhaustive, represent
the major types of moral sin that characterize the unsaved.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Paul’s third reminder (Do you not know…
cf. 1Co_6:2-3) was probably meant to
complement the thought of 1Co_6:4, but
it also illustrated the gap which existed between the Corinthians’ future
position and their present practice. The wicked would have no share in
God’s future kingdom because they were not related to Christ, the Heir
(cf. Mar_12:7). “Not inherit the
kingdom”: The kingdom is the spiritual sphere of salvation where God rules as
king over all who belong to Him by faith. All believers are in that spiritual
kingdom, yet are waiting to enter into the full inheritance of it in the age to
come. People who are characterized by these iniquities are not saved.
While
believers can and do commit these sins, they do not characterize them as an
unbroken life pattern. When they do, it demonstrates that the person is not in
God’s kingdom. True believers, who do sin, resent that sin and seek to gain the
victory over it. (see Romans 7:14-25)
Fornicators
are all who indulge in sexual immorality, but particularly unmarried persons.
Idolaters
are those who worship any false god or follow any false religious system.
Adulterers
are married persons who indulge in sexual acts outside their marriage.
Effeminate
… nor abusers of themselves are homosexuals or sodomites, terms referring to
those who exchange and corrupt normal male-female sexual roles and relations.
Tranvestism, sex changes, and other gender perversions are included.
Genesis
1:27 "So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created
he him; male and female created he them."
Deut
22:5 “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall
a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so [are] abomination unto the
LORD thy God.”
Sodomites
are so called because the sin of male-male sex dominated the city of Sodom.
This sinful perversion is condemned always, in any form, by Scripture. (Lev
18:22; 20:13; Rom. 1:26-27; 1 Tim 1:10)
Paul
is saying here, you are wrong if you think that just being baptized into Jesus
will save you. You cannot go back into sin, and commit the sins the world is
guilty of, and not be judged. He is saying, if you were really saved, you would
not have the desire in your heart to commit these sins that the world is guilty
of. Paul speaks of the unrighteous as a whole; he does not separate out those
who are pretending to be Christians for special privileges. I am sure these types
of sins are mentioned here, because of the worship of Aphrodite in this area,
and also because most of the false worship was of a sensual nature.
In
the book of James, it says faith without works is dead. We also see in the 6th
chapter of Hebrews the consequences of getting back into these sins after you
have made a commitment to God.
The wicked would one day be judged by the saints
(1Co_6:2) on the basis of their works (Rev_20:13) which would condemn them. Yet the
saints were acting no differently.
The word adikoi (“the wicked”) in 1Co_6:9 was used in 1Co_6:1,
there translated “the ungodly.” The verb form adikeite (“do wrong”) however, was
used in 1Co_6:8 to describe the
Corinthians’ behavior. Their future role should have radically affected their
practice in the present (cf. 1Jn_3:3).
If they thought otherwise, Paul warned, they were deceived (cf. 1Co_5:11; Rev_21:7-8;
Rev_22:14-15). One thing we must note
here is that the sins mentioned in verse 9 were sins of the body and seemed to
be classed together. The sins in verse 10 are also bad sins, but sins that
happen outside the body. They are not sex sins. These are still sins, but do
not include the Holy Spirit {which dwells inside of us} in their act of sin.
“Thieves
… covetous” are both guilty of the same basic sin of greed. Those who are
covetous desire what belongs to others, thieves actually take it.
Revilers
are people who try to destroy others with words.
Extortioners
are swindlers and embezzlers who steal indirectly, taking unfair advantage of
others for their own financial gain.
The
list of offenders was similar to that noted earlier (1Co_5:10-11), which no doubt corresponded to problems in
Corinth and in other large cities of the day (cf. Eph_5:3-6).
Homosexuality and male prostitution, for example, were especially
characteristic of Greco-Roman society. Plato lauded homosexual love in The
Symposium (181B). Nero, emperor at the time Paul wrote this letter, was
about to marry the boy Sporus (Suetonius Lives of the Caesars 6. 28), an
incident bizarre only in its formality, since 14 of the first 15 Roman emperors
were homosexual or bisexual.
1 Corinthians 6:11
Some (but not all) the
Corinthian Christians had been guilty of the sins listed in 1Co_6:9-10, but God had intervened. They were
washed… by the Spirit (cf. Tit_3:5),
sanctified in the Son (cf. 1Co_1:2),
and justified before God (cf. Rom_8:33).
This fact of justification was an appropriate thought for those judicially
carping Corinthians. Though
not all Christians have been guilty of all those particular sins, every
Christian is equally an ex-sinner, since Christ came to save sinners. Some who
used to have those patterns of sinful life were falling into those old signs
again, and needed reminding that if they went all the way back to live as they
used to, they were not going to inherit eternal salvation, because it would
indicate that they were never saved.
“Washed”
refers to new life through spiritual cleansing and regeneration.
“Sanctified”
(set apart) is what results in new behavior, which a transformed life always
produces. Sin’s total domination is broken and replaced by a new pattern of
obedience and holiness. Though not perfection, this is a new direction.
“Justified”
refers to a new standing before God, in which the Christian is clothed in
Christ’s righteousness. In His death, the believer’s sins were put to His
account and He suffered for them, so that His righteousness might be put to an
account, so that we might be blessed for it.
“By
the Spirit”: The Holy Spirit is the agent of salvation’s transformation.
Everyone
who ever lived has sinned and come short of the glory of God. Praise God, if we
repent, He is faithful and just to forgive us of our sin and wash us in His
precious blood. We are saved by the grace of God. We are washed in his blood
and set aside for his purpose. We are justified {just as if we had never
sinned}. The Christians standing around God's throne in heaven are clothed in
white robes, washed in the blood of the Lamb. When He saves us, we become a new
creature in Christ.
1 Corinthians 6:12
Failure to practice sexual purity
The theme of legality continued as Paul turned to
another problem troubling the Corinthian assembly. This problem was the issue
of freedom from the Old Testament Law in the area of sexual relationships. Paul
addressed this issue in the manner of a dialogue, the diatribe style, familiar
to his readers. This also enabled him to prepare them for both his subject
matter and his approach in the rest of the letter, which concerned answers to
questions and objections they had raised.
First
I want to give the definition of “expedient”: “Based on or marked by a
concern for self-interest rather than principle”, which is self explanatory.
The definition of “power” can mean influence or is a measure of a person's ability
to control the environment around them, including the behavior of other
persons. In this case, Paul refused to be influenced by either others around
him or Satan.
This
is probably one of the most controversial Scriptures in the Bible. First of
all, we must remember who Paul is writing this to. They are still very much
caught up in the regulations of their Jewish upbringing. Paul is saying, we are
not obligated to keep the letter of the law, because Jesus fulfilled the law
for us. Even in the Old Testament, we read that to obey is better than
sacrifice.
I
Samuel 15:22 "And Samuel said, Hath the LORD [as great] delight in burnt
offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey
[is] better than sacrifice, [and] to hearken than the fat of rams."
Hearken: (To give heed to)
Obeying
is an act of our own free will. We obey, because we know that it will please
God, and we want to please Him. Sacrifice, for the Jews had been an obligation,
and not a choice. Paul is saying, I am not obligated to do any particular
thing, or not do it. I choose to please God, so as an act of my own free will,
I obey God's laws.
These
new Christians were still sacrificing, and keeping the old Mosaic Law, from
obligation. They were still technical in their form of religion and did not
understand fully the sacrifice of Jesus. Paul, I believe is just saying, I am
not under the law of obligation but I am a free agent to operate my own will in
a way pleasing unto God. Paul is not saying that he has a license to sin
without the punishment for sin. He is saying that he is a free-will agent. He
chooses for himself, with the benefit of his conscience.
He,
also, is saying that he refuses to become servant to sin. Paul refuses to live
by a set of manmade rules any longer. The condition of his soul is between him
and God. A Christian has Christ dwelling within them, and they no longer have
the desire in their hearts to sin. This is what Paul is saying. If Christ,
within me makes the decisions, there is no law against that.
Galatians
3:21: "[Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid for if
there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness
should have been by the law."
Read
the 6th chapter of Romans where Paul fully explains this.
The issue of the limits of liberty (1Co_6:12) was developed later by Paul in
chapters 8-10. To a degree this subject also colored the discussion on public
worship in chapters 11-14. The question of a Christian’s relationship to food (1Co_6:13) was taken up in 1Co_8:1-13. The resurrection of Christ (1Co_6:14) was expounded in 1Co_15:1-58. The church as the body of Christ (1Co_6:15) was enlarged on in 1Co_12:1-31. The sanctity of sex (1Co_6:16), about which Paul quoted Gen_2:24 on the divine establishment of
marriage, occupied his attention in 1Co_7:1-40.
The words, everything is permissible for me,
had apparently become a slogan to cloak the immorality of some in Corinth. The
statement was true but it required qualification. Paul qualified liberty with
the principle of love applied to both neighbor and self (cf. Mar_12:31). Liberty which was not beneficial
but detrimental to someone else was not loving (1Co_8:1;
1Co_10:23) and was to be avoided. So
too, liberty which became slavery (I will not be mastered by anything)
was not love but hatred of self.
1 Corinthians 6:13-14
Food for the stomach and the stomach for food was another
slogan by which some Corinthians sought to justify their immorality. They
reasoned that “food” was both pleasurable and necessary. When their stomachs
signaled hunger, food was taken to satisfy them. So too, they argued, sex was
pleasurable and necessary. When their bodies signaled sexual desire, they
needed to be satisfied. But Paul drew a sharp line between the stomach and the body. Meats … belly”: Perhaps this was a
popular proverb to celebrate the idea that sex is purely biological, like
eating. The influence of philosophical dualism may have contributed to this
idea since it made only the body evil; therefore, what one did physically was
not preventable and thus inconsequential. Because the relationship between
these two is purely biological and temporal, the Corinthians, like many of
their pagan friends, probably used that analogy to justify sexual immorality.
“The body … The Lord”: Paul rejects the convenient justifying analogy. Bodies
and food are temporal relations that will perish.
In
the spirit, all believers make up the body of Christ. Our body is the dwelling
place for the Holy Spirit. My belly, along with my body, should not be my God,
because they will perish and the real me will live in my new spiritual body
that Jesus will provide me. If the body is such a temporary thing, we should
not elevate it to godhood.
The body (sōma)
in this context (cf. 2Co_12:3) meant
more than the physical frame; it referred to the whole person, composed of
flesh (the material) and spirit (the immaterial; cf. 2Co_2:13 with 2Co_7:5).
The “body,” therefore, was not perishable but eternal (1Co_6:14), and it was not meant for sexual
immorality (porneia) but for union with the Lord (1Co_6:15-17), which is reciprocal (cf. Eph_1:23). The eternality of the body, the
future destiny of the individual, was made certain by Christ’s resurrection (1Co_6:14; cf. 1Co_15:20).
The 15th chapter of this
same book of Corinthians goes into great detail about this very thing. We know
that the body of the Lord Jesus
Christ
died on the cross. That body was buried, and the third day He arose from the
grave. There is a physical body, and there is a spiritual body. The physical
body must die for the spiritual body to live. This mortal must put on
immortality. Because Jesus rose from the grave, all those who put their faith
in Jesus shall rise, also. Read more on this at I Thessalonians chapter 4:
verses 1-12.
Bodies
of believers and the Lord have an eternal relationship that will never perish.
He is referring to the believer’s body to be changed, raised, glorified and
made heavenly.
1 Corinthians 6:15-17
So too the work of the Spirit (cf. 1Co_12:13) has affected Christians’ present
destiny and joined them to Christ (1Co_6:15).
Could a Christian practice immorality without grieving Christ? (cf. 1Co_12:26) Never! This verse above is speaking of how bad
it is for a Christian to commit a sin of the body, because it includes the
house of the Holy Spirit in that sin. We Christians are the temple of the Holy
Spirit. All of us are individual parts making up the body of Christ. You can
see from the following Scriptures that we are one with Christ. Christ is the
head, and we are the body.
Romans
12:5 "So we, [being] many, are one body in Christ, and every one members
one of another."
I Corinthians
12:12 "For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members
of that one body, being many, are one body: so also [is] Christ."
I
Corinthians 12:27 "Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in
particular."
Therefore
when a believer commits a sexual sin, it involves Christ with a harlot.
Therefore you can easily see why it would be important not to involve the
temple of the Holy Spirit in the act of a body sin.
The union of two people involves more than
physical contact. It is also a union of personalities which, however transient,
alters both of them (1Co_6:16). Paul
quoted Gen_2:24 (The two will become
one flesh) not to affirm that a man and a prostitute are married but
to indicate the gravity of the sin (cf. Eph_5:31-32). Paul supports his point
in the previous verse by appealing to the truth of Genesis 2:24 that define the
sexual union between a man and a woman as “one flesh.” When a person is joined
to a harlot, it is a one flesh experience; there Christ spiritually is joined to
that harlot. The words “Shall be” are translated “shall
become”.
A Christian’s union with Christ likewise affects
both him and the Savior, and one cannot act without affecting the other. These two Scriptures above should be
studied carefully by those who would make husband and wife one in the spirit.
The Scriptures say that husband and wife are one in the flesh, not the spirit.
All Christians, whether male or female, are one in spirit with the Lord Jesus
Christ. Husband and wife relations on this earth are in the flesh. In heaven,
it will not be that way. There is no marrying or taking in marriage in heaven.
Further
strengthening the point, Paul affirms that all sex outside of marriage is sin;
but illicit relationships by believers are especially reprehensible because
they profane Jesus Christ who believers are one. This argument should make such
sin unthinkable.
1 Corinthians 6:18
Corinthian Christians, when faced with
immorality, should respond as did Joseph (Gen_39:12)
— they should run. Flee from sexual immorality. Immorality was a unique
sin but not the most serious (cf. Mat_12:32).
It was, however, an offense against the sinner and those with whom he was
related.
It is possible that the statement All other
sins a man commits are outside his body (the word “other” is a translator’s
addition and is not represented by any word in the Gr. text) should be taken as
a third slogan (cf. 1Co_6:12-13)
bandied about by some in Corinth. There is a sense in which sexual sin
destroys a person like o other, because it is so intimate and entangling,
corrupting on the deepest human level. But Paul is probably alluding to vereral
disease, prevalent and devastating in his day and today. No sin has greater
potential to destroy the body, something a believer should avoid because of the
reality given in verses 19-20.
Fornication,
in the verse above, includes all sorts of harlotry. This includes all unnatural
sex acts and it also includes acts not with the spouse that God has chosen for
you. The Aids patients are finding out the hard way what this type of sin
brings on. Not all Aids patients are committing this sin, but this is one of
the major ways of transmitting this disease.
If so, then Paul’s rejoinder (he who sins
sexually sins against his own body) is a straight-forward denial. The Greek
construction is similar to that in 1Co_6:13.
1 Corinthians 6:19-20
Among those grieved was the Holy Spirit
who indwells every Christian (who is in you; cf. 1Co_12:13; 1Jn_3:24). A
Christian’s body belongs to the Lord (v.13), is a member of Christ (v.15), and
is the Holy Spirit’s temple.
Think
about this. Every act of fornication, adultery or any other sin is committed by
the believer in the sanctuary, the Holy of Holies, where God dwells. In the Old
Testament, the High Priest only went in there once a year, and only after
extensive cleansing, lest he be killed.
Also God the Father is grieved, for He seeks honor
(Mat_5:16), not shame, from those who
are bought at a price (cf. 1Co_7:23),
that price being “the precious blood of Christ” (1Pe_1:19).
When Jesus paid the price
for our sin on the cross, He bought us and paid in full for us. I have used the
following Scripture numerous times, but it seems to say exactly what I want to
say on this.
Galatians
2:20 "I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but
Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the
faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me."
If Christ is in
me, then I should treat my body as if it is His temple. I should allow nothing
into the temple of God that would defame it in any way.