CLICK HERE FOR BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND MYSPACE LAYOUTS »

Thursday, February 29, 2024

Book of Joel Chapter 1 Vs. 17

A Call to Repentance

 

Verses 17-18: Seed is rotten … beast's groan: From the spiritual realm to the physical realm, all was in shambles. Though innocent, in judgment even the animals suffered (Rom. 8:18-22), the loss of food.


The seed is rotten under their clods, the garners are laid desolate, the barns are broken down; for the corn is withered. Joel 1:17


The seed is... Here we have the desolation of Israel in the day of the Lord pictured (Joel 1:17-20; 1:7-13). Not only was all to be cut off for the present, but with it, all hope for the future. The scattered seed, as it lay, each under its clod known to God, was dried up, and so decayed.

פְּרֻדָה

perûdâh

per-oo-daw'

Feminine passive participle of H6504; something separated, that is, a kernel: - seed.

עָבַשׁ

âbash

aw-bash'

A primitive root; to dry up: - be rotten.


the garners are... The treasuries, or storehouses, having nothing in them, and there being nothing to put into them; Jarchi makes these to be peculiar for wine and oil, both which failed (Joel 1:10).

אוֹצָר

'ôtsâr

o-tsaw'

From H686; a depository: - armory, cellar, garner, store(-house), treasure (-house) (-y).

the barns are... In which the wheat and barley had used to be laid up; but this judgment of the locusts and drought continuing year after year, the walls fell down, and no care was taken to repair them, there being no use for them; these were the granaries, and, as Jarchi, for wheat particularly.

מַמְּגֻרָה

mammegûrâh

mam-meg-oo-raw'

From H4048 (in the sense of depositing); a granary: - barn.

for the corn... That which sprung up withered and dried away, through the heat and drought: or was ashamed; not answering the expectation of the sower.

דָּגָן

dâgân

daw-gawn'

From H1711, properly increase, that is, grain: - corn ([floor]), wheat.

This speaks of a time, when the farmers have given up. The seed rots in the ground and does not produce. There is nothing to put in the barn, so the farmer has let it run down.



We see drought had apparently set in as well, for the seeds had shriveled. The clods (Joel 1:17) may be translated, their (i.e., the farmers’) shovels. When the farmers dug into the ground to investigate the absence of green life, the shovels uncovered seeds that had not germinated.

Book of 1 John Chapter 2 Vs. 7

 The New Commandment


Verses 7-8” John’s commandment is both old and new. This commandment, as is clear below, is to love one another. Jesus called it “new” (in John 13:34), thought it appears in similar form (in Lev. 19:18). By late in John’s life, it is no longer so new; yet in the sense that it continually transforms and renews the lives of Christians, it is and ever shall be new indeed.

Verses 7-17: Love of the brethren constitutes the fourth test of genuine fellowship. The primary focus of the moral test is obedience to the command of love because love is the fulfillment of the law (Mat. 22:34-40; Rom. 13:8-10; Jas. 2:8) and is also Christ’s new command (John 13:34; 15:12, 17). True enlightenment is to love. God’s light is the light of love, so to walk in light is to walk in love.

1 John 2:7 “Brethren, I write no new commandment unto you, but an old commandment which ye had from the beginning. The old commandment is the word which ye have heard from the beginning.”


Brethren, I write... Here, is speaking of those who are of a common faith. Jesus did not come to do away with the law, but to fulfill it. The commandment spoken of here, has to do with love. We are taught from the beginning to love one another.

Brethren (ἀδελφοὶ)

The correct reading is ἀγαπηοί beloved. The first occurrence of this title, which is suggested by the previous words concerning the relation of love.

Not referring to new in the sense of time but something that is fresh in quality, kind or form; something that replaces something else that has been worn out.

no new commandment… John makes a significant word play here. Though he doesn’t state here what the command is, he does (in 2Jhn. 5-6), it is to love. Both phrases refer to the same commandment of love.

No new commandment (οὐκ ἐντολὴν καινὴν)

The Rev., properly, places these words first in the sentence as emphatic, the point of the verse lying in the antithesis between the new and the old. On new, see on Mat. 26:29.

The commandment of love was new because Jesus personified love in a fresh, new way and it was shed abroad in believer’s hearts (Rom. 5:5) and energized by the Holy Spirit (Gal. 5:22; 1Thes. 4-9). He raised love to a higher standard for the church and commanded His disciples to imitate His love as I have loved you.

The command was also old because the Old Testament commanded love (Lev. 19:18; Deut. 6:5), and the readers of John’s epistle had heard about Jesus’ command to love when they first heard the gospel.

Old (παλαιὰν)

Four words are used in the New Testament for old or elder. Of these γέρων and πρεσβύτερος refer merely to the age of men, or, the latter, to official position based primarily upon age. Hence the official term elder. Between the two others, ἀρχαῖος and παλαιός, the distinction is not sharply maintained. Ἁρχαῖος emphasizes the reaching back to a beginning ἀρχή Thus Satan is that old ἀρχαῖος serpent, whose evil work was coeval with the beginning of time (Rev. 7:9; 20:2). The world before the flood is the old ἀρχαῖος world (2Pet. 2:5). Mnason was an old ἀρχαῖος disciple; not aged but having been a disciple from the beginning (Act. 21:16). Sophocles, in “Trachiniae,” 555, gives both words. I had an old παλαιὸν gift, i.e., received long ago, from the old ἀρχαίου Centaur. The Centaur is conceived as an old-world creature, belonging to a state of things which has passed away. It carries, therefore, the idea of old fashioned: peculiar to an obsolete state of things.

Παλαιός carries the sense of worn out by time, injury, sorrow, or other causes. Thus the old garment (Mat. 9:16) is παλαιόν. So, the old wineskins (Mat. 9:17). The old men of a living generation compared with the young of the same generation are παλαιοί. In παλαιός the simple conception of time dominates. In ἀρχαῖος there is often a suggestion of a character answering to the remote age.

The commandment is here called old because it belonged to the first stage of the Christian church. Believers had had it from the beginning of their Christian faith.

Commandment

The commandment of love. Compare John 13:34. This commandment is fulfilled in walking as Christ walked. Compare Eph. 5:1, 5:2.

from the beginning... This phrase refers not to the beginning of time but the beginning of their Christian lives, as indicated (by verse 24; 3:11; and 2Jhn. 6). This was part of the ethical instruction they received from the day of their salvation and not some innovation invented by John, as the heretics may have said.



The Word is the commandment of God. Jesus said all the law and the commandments were caught up in loving God first, and then loving your fellowman as yourself. The commandment, then, is righteous love.

When we love Him, we walk as He walked.



1Jhn. 2:3-6 introduce the issue of obedience, though it was surely implicit also in 1Jhn. 1:5-10. But John’s insistence on obeying God’s commands as a test of one’s personal intimacy and knowledge of Him leads to a natural question: Which commands did John have in mind? The answer is offered here. John did not have in mind some new obligation which his readers had never heard. On the contrary the command foremost in his mind was an old one, which you have had since the beginning (cf. 2Jhn. 1:5). No doubt John thought here especially of the command to love one another (cf. 1Jhn. 2:9-11). He emphasized his point by adding that this old command is the message logos, lit., word; cf. 1Jhn. 1:5; 3:11) which you have heard the majority of mss. add again from the beginning. Whatever innovations the readers might be confronting because of the doctrines of the antichrists, their real responsibility was to a commandment which they had heard from the very start of their Christian experience (cf. heard and from the beginning in 1Jhn. 1:1; 2:24; 3:11).

John’s affectionate concern for them is seen in his use of Agapētoi, literally, Beloved and here rendered Dear friends. He used the same word in 1Jhn. 3:2, 3:21; 4:1, 4:7, 4:11 and Agapēte Dear friend in 3Jhn. 1:2, 1:5, 1:11.

Friday, February 23, 2024

Book of Joel Chapter 1 Vs. 16

 A Call to Repentance


Is not the meat cut off before our eyes, yea, joy and gladness from the house of our God? Joel 1:16


Is not the... Question 2. Next, Joe. 2:11.


לֹה לוֹא לֹא

lô' lô' lôh

lo, lo, lo

lo; a primitive particle; not (the simple or abstract negation); by implication no; often used with other particles: - X before, + or else, ere, + except, ig [-norant], much, less, nay, neither, never, no ([-ne], -r, [-thing]), (X as though . . . , [can-], for) not (out of), of nought, otherwise, out of, + surely, + as truly as, + of a truth, + verily, for want, + whether, without.

meat cut off... Such an interrogation most strongly affirms; it was a matter beyond all question, but they could see it with their eyes. It was a plain case, and not to be denied, that every eatable thing or that of which food was custom to be made, was cut off by the locusts, or the drought.

אֹכֶל

'ôkel

o'-kel

From H398; food: - eating, food, meal [-time], meat, prey, victuals.

yea, joy and... The harvest being perished, there were no firstfruits brought to the temple, which used to be attended with great joy. And the corn and vines being wasted, no meat offerings made of fine flour, nor drink offerings of wine, were offered, which used to make God and man glad.

Nor any other sacrifices, on which the priests and their families lived, and were matter of joy to them; and these they ate of in the temple, or in courts adjoining to it.

The meat, corn, and fruit were all cut off. There was famine in the land. There were no sacrifices, because there was nothing left to sacrifice. This destruction really comes from God. He may use some ruler to finalize the destruction, but it is truly from God who is angry. The loss of foodstuff is a direct judgment from God. The war is indirect, but it comes from God, too.

שִׂמְחָה

śimchâh

sim-khaw'

From H8056; blithesomeness or glee, (religious or festival): - X exceeding (-ly), gladness, joy (-fulness), mirth, pleasure, rejoice (-ing).

אֱלֹהִים

'ĕlôhı̂ym

el-o-heem'

Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: - angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.



Joel 1:16-20 contain a detailed description of the aftermath of the locust plague. By again concentrating on the unique nature of this particular event, the prophet supported his contention that the destructive day of the Lord was around the corner (cf. near in Joel 1:15).

The people were all too aware (before their very eyes) that their food supply, and with it all reason to rejoice, had disappeared (Joel 1:16).

Book of 1 John Chapter 2 Vs. 6

 Christ Our Advocate


1 John 2:6 “He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.”


He that saith... Everyone who makes a Christian profession ought to walk as Christ did (1Jhn. 2:6; 3:1-10; 4:17; 1Pet. 2:21). To be in Christ means that one is a new creature and that affections and lusts of the flesh have been crucified (2Cor. 5:17; Gal. 5:16-26; Rom. 8:12-13; Col. 3:5-10).

abideth in him... Ten proofs of abiding in Christ:

1. Walking as Christ walked (1Jhn. 2:6)

2. Love of the brethren (1Jhn. 2:10; 3:14-15)

3. God’s Word abiding within (1Jhn. 2:14)

4. Doing the will of God (1Jhn. 2:17)

5. Permission of individual (1Jhn. 2:24-25)

6. Continued anointing (1Jhn. 2:27)

7. Freedom from sin (1Jhn. 3:6)

8. Keeping commandments (1Jhn. 3:24; John 15:10)

9. Indwelling Spirit (1Jhn. 3:24)

10. Fruit bearing (John 15:4, 15:7)

He abideth in Him (ἐν αὐτῷ μένειν)

To abide in God is a more common expression with John than to be in God, and marks an advance in thought. The phrase is a favorite one with John. See John 15:4 sqq.; John 6:56; 1Jhn. 2:24, 2:27, 2:28; 3:6, 3:24; 4:12 sq.; 4:15 sq. Bengel notes the gradation in the three phrases to know Him, to be in Him, to abide in Him; knowledge, fellowship, constancy.

Abides or Abideth is one of John’s favorite terms for salvation. Even as he walked: Jesus’ life of obedience is the Christian’s pattern. Those who claim to be Christian's ought to live as He did (John 6:38), since they possess His Spirit’s presence and power.

Ought (ὀφείλει)

An obligation, put as a debt. See Luke 17:10, and on debts, Mat. 6:12. The word expresses a special, personal obligation, and not as δεῖ must, an obligation in the nature of things. See John 20:9 and compare 1Jhn. 3:16; 4:11; 3Jhn. 1:8.

This is referring to Jesus’ earthly days. While no one can or need duplicate Jesus’ atoning ministry, His disciples are called on to imitate His devotion to God and compassion for others (see John 13:15 and 1Pet. 2:21).

Jesus placed His footprints for us. If we are following Him as we should, we will step in those footprints. Walk, in this instance, is speaking of making it a habit to walk in the footprints of Jesus. This is not an occasional encounter with God, but a way of life.

He (ἐκεῖνος)

Always of Christ in the Epistles of John. See ἐκείνης, referring to ἁμαρτία sin, 1Jhn. 5:16.


THE INFLUENCE OF THE GREAT LIFE WALK A PERSONAL INFLUENCE


This verse is one of those in reading which we may easily fall into the fallacy of mistaking familiarity for knowledge.

Let us bring out its meaning with accuracy.

St. John’s hatred of unreality, of lying in every form, leads him to claim in Christians a perfect correspondence between the outward profession and the inward life, as well as the visible manifestation of it. He that saith always marks a danger to those who are outwardly in Christian communion. It is the take notice of a hidden falsity. He whose claim, possibly whose vaunt, is that he abideth in Christ, has contracted a moral debt of far-reaching significance. St. John seems to pause for a moment. He points to a picture in a page of the scroll which is beside him-the picture of Christ in the Gospel drawn by himself; not a vague magnificence, a mere harmony of colour, but a likeness of absolute historical truth. Every pilgrim of time in the continuous course of his daily walk, outward and inward, has by the possession of that Gospel contracted an obligation to be walking by the one great life walk of the Pilgrim of eternity. The very depth and intensity of feeling half hushes the Apostle’s voice. Instead of the beloved Name which all who love it will easily supply, St. John uses the reverential He, the pronoun which specially belongs to Christ in the vocabulary of the Epistle. He that saith he abideth in Him is bound, even as He once walked, to be ever walking.

I The importance of example in the moral and spiritual life gives emphasis to this canon of St. John.

Such an example as can be sufficient for creatures like us should be at once manifested in concrete form and susceptible of ideal application.

This was felt by a great, but unhappily antichristian, thinker, the exponent of a severe and lofty morality. Mr. Mill fully confesses that there may be an elevating and an ennobling influence in a Divine ideal; and thus justifies the apparently startling precept-be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect. But he considered that some more human model was necessary for the moral striver. He recommends novel readers, when they are charmed or strengthened by some conception of pure manhood or womanhood, to carry that conception with them into their own lives. He would have them ask themselves in difficult positions, how that strong and lofty man, that tender and unselfish woman, would have behaved in similar circumstances, and so bear about with them a standard of duty at once compendious and affecting. But to this there is one fatal objection-that such an elaborate process of make believe is practically impossible. A fantastic morality, if it were possible at all, must be a feeble morality. Surely an authentic example will be greatly more valuable.

But example, however precious, is made indefinitely more powerful when it is living example, example crowned by personal influence.

So far as the stain of a guilty past can be removed from those who have contracted it, they are improvable and capable of restoration, chiefly, perhaps almost exclusively, by personal influence in some form. When a process of deterioration and decay has set in in any human soul, the germ of a more wholesome growth is introduced in nearly every case, by the transfusion and transplantation of healthier life. We test the soundness or the putrefaction of a soul by its capacity of receiving and assimilating this germ of restoration. A parent is in doubt whether is susceptible of renovation, whether the son has not become wholly evil. He tries to bring the young man under the personal influence of a friend of noble and sympathetic character. Has his son any capacity left for being touched by such a character; of admiring its strength on one side, its softness on another? When he is in contact with it, when he perceives how pure, how self-sacrificing, how true and straight it is, is there a glow in his face, a trembling of his voice, a moisture in his eye, a wholesome self-humiliation? Or does he repel all this with a sneer and a bitter gibe? Has he that evil attitude which is possessed only by the most deeply corrupt-they blaspheme, rail at glories. The Chaplain of a penitentiary records that among the most degraded of its inmates was one miserable creature. The Matron met her with firmness, but with a good will which no hardness could break down, no insolence overcome. One evening after prayers the Chaplain observed this poor outcast stealthily kissing the shadow of the Matron thrown by her candle upon the wall. He saw that the diseased nature was beginning to be capable of assimilating new life, that the victory of wholesome personal influence had begun. He found reason for concluding that his judgment was well founded.

The law of restoration by living example through personal influence pervades the whole of our human relations under God’s natural and moral government as truly as the principle of mediation. This law also pervades the system of restoration revealed to us by Christianity. It is one of the chief results of the Incarnation itself. It begins to act upon us first, when the Gospels become something more to us than a mere history, when we realize in some degree how He walked. But it is not complete until we know that all this is not merely of the past, but of the present; that He is not dead but living; that we may therefore use that little word is about Christ in the lofty sense of St. John-even as He is pure; in Him is no sin; even as He is righteous; He is the propitiation for our sins. If this is true, as it undoubtedly is, of all good human influence personal and living, is it not true of the personal and living Christ in an infinitely higher degree? If the shadow of Peter overshadowing the sick had some strange efficacy; if handkerchiefs or aprons from the body of Paul wrought upon the sick and possessed; what may be the spiritual result of contact with Christ Himself? Of one of those men specially gifted to raise struggling natures and of others like him, a true poet lately taken from us has sung in one of his most glorious strains. Matthew Arnold likens mankind to a host inexorably bound by divine appointment to march over mountain and desert to the city of God. But they become entangled in the wilderness through which they march, split into mutinous factions, and are in danger of battering on the rocks forever in vain, of dying one by one in the waste. Then comes the poet’s appeal to the Servants of God: -

"Then in the hour of need

Of your fainting, dispirited race,

Ye like angels appear!

Languor is not in your heart,

Weakness is not in your word,

Weariness not on your brow.

Eyes rekindling, and prayers

Follow your steps as ye go.

Ye fill up the gaps in our file,

Strengthen the wavering line,

Stablish, continue our march-

On, to the bound of the waste-

On to the City of God."

If all this be true of the personal influence of good and strong men-true in proportion to their goodness and strength-it must be true of the influence of the Strongest and Best with Whom we are brought into personal relation by prayer and sacraments, and by meditation upon the sacred record which tells us what His one life walk was. Strength is not wanting upon His part, for He is able to save to the uttermost. Pity is not wanting; for to use touching words attributed to St. Paul in a very ancient apocryphal document, He alone sympathized with a world that has lost its way.

Let it not be forgotten that in that of which St. John speaks lies the true answer to an objection, formulated by the great antichristian writer above quoted, and constantly repeated by others. The ideal of Christian morality, says Mr. Mill, is negative rather than positive; passive rather than active; innocence rather than nobleness; abstinence from evil, rather than energetic pursuit of good; in its precepts as has been well said, thou shalt not predominates unduly over thou shalt. The answer is this.

(1) A true religious system must have a distinct moral code. If not, it would be justly condemned for expressing itself (in the words of Mr. Mill’s own accusation against Christianity elsewhere) in language most general and possessing rather the impressiveness of poetry or eloquence than the precision of legislation. But the necessary formula of precise legislation is, thou shalt not; and without this it cannot be precise.

(2) But further. To say that Christian legislation is negative, a mere string of thou shalt nots, is just such a superficial accusation as might be expected from a man who should enter a church upon some rare occasion, and happen to listen to the Ten Commandments, but fall asleep before he could hear the Epistle and Gospel. The philosopher of duty, Kant, has told us that the peculiarity of a moral principle, of any proposition which states what duty is, is to convey the meaning of an imperative through the form of an indicative. In his own expressive, if pedantic, language-its categorical form involves an epistatic meaning. St. John asserts that the Christian ought to walk even as Christ walked. To everyone who receives it, that proposition is therefore precisely equivalent to a command - walk as Christ walked. Is it a negative, passive morality, a mere system of thou shalt not, which contains such a precept as that? Does not the Christian religion in virtue of this alone enforce a great thou shalt; which every man who brings himself within its range will find rising with him in the morning, following him like his shadow all day long, and lying down with him when he goes to rest?

II It should be clearly understood that in the words even as He walked, the Gospel of St. John is both referred to and attested.

For surely, to point with any degree of moral seriousness to an example, is to presuppose some clear knowledge and definite record of it. No example can be beautiful or instructive when its shape is lost in darkness. It has indeed been said by a deeply religious writer, that the likeness of the Christian to Christ is to His character, not to the particular form in which it was historically manifested. And this, of course, is in one sense a truism. But how else except by this historical manifestation can we know the character of Christ in any true sense of the word knowledge? For those who are familiar with the fourth Gospel, the term walk was tenderly significant. For if it was used with a reminiscence of the Old Testament and of the language of our Lord, to denote the whole continuous activity of the life of any man inward and outward, there was another signification which became entwined with it. St. John had used the word historically in his Gospel, not without allusion to the Saviour’s homelessness on earth, to His itinerant life of beneficence and of teaching. Those who first received this Epistle with deepest reverence as the utterance of the Apostle whom they loved, when they came to the precept-walk even as He walked-would ask themselves how did He walk? What do we know of the great rule of life thus proposed to us? The Gospel which accompanied this letter, and with which it was in some way closely connected, was a sufficient and definite answer.

III The character of Christ in his Gospel is thus, according to St. John, the loftiest ideal of purity, peace, self-sacrifice, unbroken communion with God, the inexhaustible fountain of regulated thoughts, high aims, holy action, constant prayer. We may advert to one aspect of this perfection as delineated in the fourth Gospel- our Lord’s way of doing small things, or at least things which in human estimation appear to be small.

The fourth chapter of that Gospel contains a marvelous record of word and work. Let us trace that record back to its beginning. There are seeds of spiritual life scattered in many hearts which were destined to yield a rich harvest in due time; there is the account of one sensuous nature, quickened and spiritualized; there are promises which have been for successive centuries as a river of God to weary natures. All these results issue from three words spoken by a tired traveler, sitting naturally over a well-give me to drink.

We take another instance. There is one passage in St. John’s Gospel which divides with the proscenium of his Epistle the glory of being the loftiest, the most prolonged, the most sustained, in the Apostle’s writings.

It is the prelude of a work which might have seemed to be of little moment. Yet all the height of a great ideal is over it, like the vault of heaven; all the power of a Divine purpose is under it, like the strength of the great deep; all the consciousness of His death, of His ascension, of His coming dominion, of His Divine origin, of His session at God’s right hand-all the hoarded love in His heart for His own which were in the world-passes by some mysterious transference into that little incident of tenderness and of humiliation. He sets an everlasting mark upon it, not by a basin of gold crusted with gems, nor by mixing precious scents with the water which He poured out, nor by using linen of the finest tissue, but by the absolute perfection of love and dutiful humility in the spirit and in every detail of the whole action. It is one more of those little chinks through which the whole sunshine of heaven streams in upon those who have eyes to see. (John 13:1-6)

The underlying secret of this feature of our Lord’s character is told by Himself. My meat is to be ever doing the will of Him that sent Me, and so, when the times come, by one great decisive act to finish His work. All along the course of that life walk there were smaller preludes to the great act which won our redemption- multitudinous daily little perfect epitomes of love and sacrifice, without which the crowning sacrifice would not have been what it was. The plan of our life must, of course, be constructed on a scale as different as the human from the Divine. Yet there is a true sense in which this lesson of the great life may be applied to us. The apparently small things of life must not be despised or neglected on account of their smallness, by those who would follow the precept of St. John. Patience and diligence in petty trades, in services called menial, in waiting on the sick and old, in a hundred such works, all come within the sweep of this net, with its lines that look as thin as cobwebs, and which yet for Christian hearts are stronger than fibres of steel-walk even as He walked. This, too, is our only security. A French poet has told a beautiful tale. Near a river which runs between French and German territory, a blacksmith was at work one snowy night near Christmas time. He was tired out, standing by his forge, and wistfully looking towards his little home, lighted up a short quarter of a mile away, and wife and children waiting for their festal supper, when he should return. It came to the last piece of his work, a rivet which it was difficult to finish properly; for it was of peculiar shape, intended by the contractor who employed him to pin the metal work of a bridge which he was constructing over the river. The smith was sorely tempted to fail in giving honest work, to hurry over a job which seemed at once so troublesome and so trifling. But some good angel whispered to the man that he should do his best. He turned to the forge with a sigh, and never rested until the work was as complete as his skill could make it. The poet carries us on for a year or two. War breaks out. A squadron of the blacksmith’s countrymen is driven over the bridge in headlong flight. Men, horses, guns, try its solidity. For a moment or two the whole weight of the mass really hangs upon the one rivet. There are times in life when the whole weight of the soul also hangs upon a rivet; the rivet of sobriety, of purity, of honesty, of command of temper. Possibly we have devoted little or no honest work to it in the years when we should have perfected the work; and so, in the day of trial, the rivet snaps, and we are lost.

There is one word of encouragement which should be finally spoken for the sake of one class of God’s servants.

Some are sick, weary, broken, paralyzed, it may be slowly dying. What-they sometimes think-have we to do with this precept? Others who have hope, elasticity, capacity of service, may walk as He walked; but we can scarcely do so. Such persons should remember what walking in the Christian sense is all life’s activity inward and outward. Let them think of Christ upon His cross. He was fixed to it, nailed hand and foot. Nailed; yet never-not when He trod upon the waves, not when He moved upward through the air to His throne-never did He walk more truly, because He walked in the way of perfect love. It is just whilst looking at the move-less form upon the tree that we may hear most touchingly the great thou shalt-thou shalt walk even as He walked.

IV As there is a literal, so there is a mystical walking as Christ walked. This is an idea which deeply pervades St. Paul’s writings. Is it His birth? We are born again. Is it His life? We walk with Him in newness of life. Is it His death? We are crucified with Him. Is it His burial? We are buried with Him. Is it His resurrection? We are risen again with Him. Is it His ascension-His very session at God’s right hand? He hath raised us up and made us sit together with Him in heavenly places. They know nothing of St. Paul’s mind who know nothing of this image of a soul seen in the very dust of death, loved, pardoned, quickened, elevated, crowned, throned. It was this conception at work from the beginning in the general consciousness of Christians which moulded round itself the order of the Christian year.

It will illustrate this idea for us if we think of the difference between the outside and the inside of a church.

Outside on some high spire we see the light just lingering far up, while the shadows are coldly gathering in the streets below; and we know that it is winter. Again the evening falls warm and golden on the churchyard, and we recognise the touch of summer. But inside it is always God’s weather; it is Christ all the year long. Now the Babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, or circumcised with the knife of the law, manifested to the Gentiles, or manifesting Himself with a glory that breaks through the veil; now the Man tempted in the wilderness; now the victim dying on the cross; now the Victor risen, ascended, sending the Holy Spirit; now for twenty-five Sundays worshipped as the Everlasting Word with the Father and the Holy Ghost. In this mystical following of Christ also, the one perpetual lesson is - he that saith he abideth in Him, ought himself also so to walk even as He walked.



John added, This is how we know we are in Him: Whoever claims to live in Him must walk as Jesus did. (The translators have supplied the word Jesus which is represented in the original by a pronoun.) In these statements, John used two other expressions (in Him and live in Him) which further his thought. As with the connection he makes between obedience and the knowledge of God, here too the Upper Room Discourse (John 13-16) is the seed-plot from which these ideas come. The concept involved is derived especially from the Parable of the Vine and the Branches (John 15:1-8). The vine-branch relationship is an image of the discipleship experience. Jesus said, “This is to My Father’s glory, that you bear much fruit, showing yourselves to be My disciples” (John 15:8). In 1Jhn. 2:5-6 discipleship is also in view, as is seen from the reference to the imitation of Christ in 1Jhn. 2:6. Moreover, the Greek term rendered in the NIV by live (menō) is the same verb used in John 15:4 where the NIV translates it remain.

It would be a mistake to equate the concept of being in Him as John uses it here with the Pauline concept of being in Christ. For Paul, the words in Christ describe a Christian’s permanent position in God’s Son with all its attendant privileges. With John, the kind of relationship pictured in the vine-branch imagery describes an experience that can be ruptured (John 15:6) with a resultant loss of fellowship and fruitfulness. Thus here in 1John, the proof that a person is enjoying this kind of experience is to be found in a life modeled after that of Jesus in obedience to His Word. In short, 1Jhn. 2:5-6 continues to talk about the believer’s fellowship with God.