Romans 7:13
Paul then considered still another possible
misunderstanding in his effort to clarify the relationship of sin and the Law.
Taking the last-mentioned quality of the commandment (“good”), he asked, Did
that which is good, then, become death to me? Once again his immediate
response was a vehement denial (By no means! mē genoito; cf. comments on Rom_3:4), followed by an explanation. The
principle of sin, not the Law, becomes death to an individual (Rom_5:12). But sin uses the
commandment, the good thing, as an agent or instrument to keep on
producing death in a person and thereby sin is seen as utterly
(lit., “exceedingly”) sinful. The
internal principle or nature of sin uses the specific commandments of the Law
of God — in part and in the whole; a “holy, righteous, and good” thing in
itself — to me This
is speaking of the law and it’s asking “has then what is good become death”? Sin
is the cause of spiritual death, not the good law.
An
awareness of the true nature of sin and its deadly character, which brings the
sinner to see his need of salvation, is the very purpose God intended the law
to serve.
Until
Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden, there was no knowledge of good and
evil. Sin entered into the world through Adam.
In
the remaining verses of this chapter, some interpret this chronicle of Paul’s
inner conflict as describing his life before Christ. They point out that Paul
describes the person as “sold under sin”; as having “nothing good’ in him, and
as a “wretched man” trapped in a “body of death”.
Those
descriptions seem to contradict the way Paul describes the believer in chapter
6. However, it is correct to understand Paul here to be speaking about a
believer. This person desires to obey God’s law and hates his sin. He is
humble, recognizing that nothing good dwells in his humanness, he sees sin in
himself, but not as all that is there and he serves Jesus Christ with his mind.
Paul
has already established that none of those attitudes ever describe the unsaved.
Paul’s use of present tense verbs in verses 14-25 strongly supports the idea
that he is describing his life currently as a Christian. For those reasons, it
seems certain that chapter 7 describes a believer.
However,
of those who agree that this is a believer, there is still disagreement. Some
see a carnal, fleshly Christian; others a legalistic Christian, frustrated by
his feeble attempts in his own power to please God by keeping the Mosaic Law.
But the personal pronoun “I” refers to the apostle Paul, a standard of
spiritual health and maturity.
Paul
must be describing all Christians, even the most spiritual and mature who, when
they honestly evaluate themselves against the righteous standard of God’s law,
realize how far short they fall. He does so in a series of four laments.
(14-17, 18-20, 20-23, 24-25)
The internal principle or
nature of sin uses the specific commandments of the Law of God — in part and in
the whole; a “holy, righteous, and good” thing in itself — to manifest its true
nature as opposed to God and to demonstrate its power within individuals.
Romans 7:14
The Believer And Sin
Understanding the conflict in personal
sanctification involves seeing the relationship between a believer and his
indwelling sin. In Rom_7:14 Paul made a
transition from the previous subject (Rom_7:7-13)
to the next one. The statement, The Law is spiritual (cf. Rom_7:12), is not only the conclusion of Paul’s
previous argument but also an accepted fact among people. The Law comes from
God who is Spirit (Joh_4:24) and
expresses God’s will for human living. Paul, using himself as the example, said
the problem is that I am unspiritual (sarkinos, “fleshy, made of
flesh”). In addition he was sold as a slave (perf. tense, “had been sold
and remained in that state”) to sin (lit. “Under the sin”; cf. “under
sin” in Rom_3:9). The law is spiritual
meaning it reflects God’s holy character.
Carnal
means “of flesh. This means earthbound, mortal and still incarcerated in
unredeemed humanness. Paul does not say he is still “in the flesh”, but the
flesh is in him.
Sold
under sin means that sin no longer controls the whole man as with an
unbeliever, but it does hold captive the believer’s members, or his fleshly
body. Sin contaminates him and frustrates his inner desire to obey the will of
God.
In
relating his personal experience in Rom_7:14-25
Paul consistently used the present tense whereas he had used the imperfect and
aorist tenses. Obviously he was describing his present conflict as a Christian
with indwelling sin and its continuing efforts to control his daily life. The
clause, “sold under sin” (KJV), describes an unregenerate person; but sin also
resides in a believer, who is still subject to sin’s penalty of physical death.
As a result, indwelling sin continues to seek to claim what it considers its
property even after one has become a Christian.
Romans 7:15-17
At the start Paul confessed, I do not understand
what I do (lit., “what I am producing I do not know”). He was like a little
boy whose honest answer to why he did something wrong is, “I don’t know.” A
person’s actions are at the dictate of someone or something besides himself
that he really does not understand and cannot explain. Paul continued to
present this quandary he faced: For what I want to do I do not do (lit.,
“For what I am wishing, that I am not doing,” prassō) and conversely, What
I hate I do (lit., “What I am hating that I am doing,” poiō). The sense here is that
Paul found himself doing things he did not approve of.
We
see in verse 15, the struggle that all mankind faces. The struggle is truly
between our flesh and spirit. Paul
desires to have his spirit in control at all times. He says that sometimes his
flesh wins out. It is a daily struggle for all of us. To live for Jesus the
spirit has to overcome the flesh.
Galatians
5:17 "For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the
flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the
things that ye would."
No difference of emphasis can be put in this
verse on the two Greek verbs translated “do” (even though such difference is
significant elsewhere), because the occurrence of those two verbs is reversed
in Rom_7:19. This statement can be made
by an unregenerate person in his highest moral and ethical moments, but it can
also be said by a regenerate person. There is no reason to conclude that Paul
was not describing his experience as a believer at that time. Paul said, I
agree that the Law is good. Paul’s new nature defends the divine standard; the
perfectly righteous law is not responsible for his sin. His new self longs to
honor the law and keep it perfectly.
Here
the Greek word for “good” is kalos, “beautiful, noble,
excellent,” whereas in Rom_7:12 it is agathē, “useful, upright.”
Because of this evidence, Paul concluded, It is no longer I myself who do it
(lit., “no longer am I myself producing it”; cf. Rom_7:15)
but it is sin living in me (lit., “but the dwelling-in-me sin”). The quickest way to
tell if we are following after the flesh is if whatever you are doing feels
good to the flesh. If the flesh is
enjoying your actions, it is probably displeasing to the spirit.
Paul’s
new inner self, the new “I”, no longer approved of the sin that was still
residing in his flesh, like his old self did, but rather strongly disapproved.
Paul
was saying that his sin did not flow out of his new redeemed innermost (“I”)
self, but from his unredeemed humanness, his flesh “in me”.
This
does not mean Paul was avoiding personal responsibility for his actions; he was
speaking of the conflict between his desires and the sin within him.
Romans 7:18-20
Paul’s experience convinced him that “the Law is
good” (Rom_7:16). But he also
concluded, I know that nothing good lives in me. Then he hastened to
explain that by the phrase “in me” he meant in my sinful nature (sarki, “flesh”; cf. Rom_7:5, Rom_7:25).
This is not literal physical or material flesh, but the principle of sin that
expresses itself through one’s mind and body.
As
support for this conclusion Paul explained, For I have the desire to do what
is good (“For to wish is present with me” [or “is lying beside me”]), but
I cannot carry it out (lit., “but to produce the good is not”) No man's flesh follows
God. Man's flesh must be crucified for the spirit to reign.
The
flesh serves as a base camp from which sin operates in the Christian’s life. It
is not sinful inherently, but because of its fallenness, it is still subject to
sin and is thoroughly contaminated.
The
flesh is that part of the believer’s present being that remains unredeemed.
Galatians
5:24-26 "And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the
affections and lusts." "If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in
the Spirit." "Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one
another, envying one another."
Paul
is trying to say that the flesh of man is a hindrance to him. Even Jesus, when
facing the cruel death of the cross, said (my spirit is willing, but my flesh
is weak). We must somehow get our flesh
and the lusts thereof under subjection to the spirit of God within us.
Paul
then repeated in slightly different words the statement of Rom_7:15, and then in Rom_7:20 he repeated in effect his statement in Rom_7:17. We see that flesh does not desire to do good,
only evil. I feel Paul is making a point
that we must stay away from the influence of the flesh.
Paul
recognized that even as a believer he had an indwelling principle of sin
that once owned him as a slave and that still expressed itself through him to
do things he did not want to do and not to do things he desired to do. Paul is making a point,
again, about the flesh in verse 17. This in the flesh sin must be put to death.
This
is a problem common to all believers.
Romans 7:21-23
Paul was a person who tried to learn from his
experiences, so now he concluded; I find this law at work. This
is not the Mosaic Law, of course, but a principle drawn from experience. Also
in Rom_8:2 “law” (nomos) means principle. This
law or principle is the reality of ever-present evil in an individual
whenever he wants to do good. Paul held fast to the fact that, as he
said, In my inner being I delight in God’s Law (cf. Rom_7:25). “In my inner being” is literally,
“according to the inner man.” (The “inner man” is used in the Gr. NT also in 2Co_4:16 and Eph_3:16.)
Delight in God’s Law was the psalmist’s response, stated repeatedly in Psa_119:1-176 (e.g., Psa_119:16,
Psa_119:24, Psa_119:47;
cf. Psa_1:2). Because of regeneration,
a believer has a new nature or capacity for loving spiritual truths. Yet,
recognizing the facts of experience, Paul said he saw another law or
principle at work within him. This is the principle of sin. Paul called
it “sin living in me” (Rom_7:17, Rom_7:20), “evil” right there with me (Rom_7:21), and “the sinful nature” (Rom_7:5, Rom_7:18,
Rom_7:25). Hear the cry of a man
who desires to please God.
Psalms
19:12-14 "Who can understand [his] errors? Cleanse thou me from secret
[faults]." (Added emphasis with italics by editor) "Keep back
thy servant also from presumptuous [sins]; let them not have dominion over me:
then shall I be upright, and I shall be innocent from the great
transgression." "Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my
heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer."
This
is not a reference to God’s law, but to an inviolable spiritual principle.
This
principle is continually doing two things: waging war against the law of
the believer’s mind and making him a prisoner of the law of sin at
work within his members. The believer’s justified, new inner self no
longer sides with sin, but joyfully agrees with the law of God against sin. This is a corresponding spiritual principle to the one
in verse 21. But this principle, which Paul identifies as “the law of sin,”
operates in the members of his body, that is, his unredeemed and still sinful
humanness, waging war against his desire to obey God’s law.
“Law of my mind” is equivalent
to the new inner self, which longs to obey the law of God. Paul is not saying
his mind is spiritual and his body is inherently evil.
The
indwelling principle of sin is constantly mounting a military campaign against
the new nature, trying to gain victory and control (cf. “slave” in Rom_7:14, Rom_7:25
and “slaves” in Rom_6:17, Rom_6:19-20), of a believer and his actions. The
new nature is called “the law” of the “mind” (noos; cf. Rom_7:25) because it has the capacity for
perceiving and making moral judgments. Further, despite a believer’s
identification with Jesus Christ’s death and resurrection and his efforts to
have Christ-honoring attitudes and actions, he cannot in his own power resist
his indwelling sin nature. In and of himself he repeatedly experiences defeat
and frustration.
Romans 7:24-25
Paul expressed that frustration in his
exclamation, What a wretched man I am! Significantly Paul’s description
of himself is part of John’s picture of the church of Laodicea — “wretched” (Rev_3:17). The apostle then asked who will
rescue me from this body of death. Now we see Paul's point in all of this. There is
no way within ourselves that we can overcome the problems between our flesh
wanting to sin and our spirit knowing sin is wrong. The only solution is to
give ourselves over to Jesus Christ and no longer live our own lives, but let
Jesus live in us and through us.
In
frustration and grief, Paul laments his sin. A believer perceives his own
sinfulness in direct proportion to how clearly he sees the holiness of God and
perfection of His law.
The
word deliver means “to rescue form danger” and was used of a soldier pulling
his wounded comrade from the battlefield. Paul longed to be rescued from his
sinful flesh.
“Body
of this death”: The believer’s unredeemed humanness, which has its base of
operation in the body. Tradition says that an ancient tribe near Tarsus tied
the corpse of a murder victim to its murderer, allowing its spreading decay to
slowly infect and execute the murderer. Perhaps that is the image Paul has in
mind here.
Paul recognized that as long as he was in his
mortal body he would face the conflict with the indwelling sin principle and
would have defeat in his own strength. Here he wrote of the “body of death”; in
Rom_6:6 he wrote of the “body of sin.”
These mean that sin works through one’s human body (cf. Rom_6:6, Rom_6:12-13,
Rom_6:19; Rom_7:5,
Rom_7:23), bringing death (Rom_6:16, Rom_6:21,
Rom_6:23; Rom_7:10-11,
Rom_7:13; Rom_8:10).
Paul’s answer to this question was triumphant and immediate: Thanks be to
God — through Jesus Christ our Lord! Paul in this answer was looking to the
final triumph of Jesus Christ for His people. Just as believers are identified
with Him in His death and resurrection by faith here and now, so they will join
their resurrected and exalted Lord for all eternity in new bodies, free forever
from the presence of sin (Rom_8:23; Php_3:20-21). Meanwhile, in this life, Paul
concluded, I myself in my mind (noi; cf. noos in Rom_7:23) am a slave (lit., “am serving
as a slave”) to God’s Law, but in the sinful nature (sarki, “flesh”; cf. Rom_7:5, Rom_7:18,
where sarki, from sarx, is also trans. “sinful
nature”) a slave to the law of sin (cf. “slave to sin,” Rom_7:14). The first part of this verse answers the
question Paul just raised. He is certain that Christ will eventually rescue him
when He returns. The second half summarizes the two sides of the struggle Paul
has described.
“With
the mind” is the new inner self, which longs to obey the law of God.
“The
law of sin,” operates in the members of his body, waging war against his desire
to obey God’s law.
While
awaiting freedom from the presence of sin, believers still face conflicts
between their regenerated minds (or new natures or capacities) and their sin
natures or capacities.
0 comments:
Post a Comment