Romans 9:1-5
God’s Righteousness Revealed in Sovereign Choice
Since God is the self-existent Being who is the
Creator of everything that exists outside Himself, He is sovereign and can
therefore use and dispose of His Creation as He wishes. This sovereignty
reveals not only His personal righteousness but also His provided
righteousness.
God’s
sovereign choice enunciated
Paul here discussed God’s sovereign choice
because of a practical problem. The Jews gloried in the fact that as Israelites
they were God’s Chosen People (Deu_7:6;
cf. Rom_2:17-20; Rom_3:1-2). But now in God’s program of
salvation in the church, Jewish involvement was decreasing while Gentile
participation was becoming dominant. Had God, then, abandoned the Jewish
people? This is ultimately explained by God’s sovereign choice, a principle
which has always been in operation even within the Chosen People of Israel and
between Israel and other nations. Now this principle operates in God’s purposes
for Israel and the church and in His dealings with Jews and Gentiles within the
church.
Israel’s Privileges
By
repetition in positive and negative terms (internally attested by the witness
of his own conscience in the presence of the Holy Spirit) Paul
affirmed his deep anguish of heart over the rejection of the
gospel by the vast majority of Jews. We
will see in the beginning of this chapter a sorrowful Paul. As we have said
before in these lessons, Paul was a Pharisee and he never would quite give up
on his Jewish brothers. He went to great lengths to try to reach them over and
over. His greatest opposition came from his own people. In many cases, Paul practiced the old Jewish
law to try to win them to Christ, but even this failed and Paul went away
sorrowful.“Conscience” and “In the Holy Spirit” is speaking of only when the Spirit controls the conscience can it be trusted, but it remains imperfect and its warnings must always be evaluated against the Word of God.
It is a very good idea that any time you hear something you are not sure of, that you confirm it by the Word of God. That’s what the Bereans’ did in Acts 17:10-11 “And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming [thither] went into the synagogue of the Jews.” “These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.”
His desire for their salvation was so strong that he was at the point
of wishing (imperf. tense, I could wish) that he were cursed and cut
off from Christ for his kinsmen, the Israelites. The Greek word for accursed is anathema
meaning “to devote to destruction in eternal hell”.
We see, here, in this verse that
Paul would have gone to almost any length to have his Israelite brothers come
to Christ. He says that he would even give up his own salvation, if this would
have saved them. Paul makes it clear,
here, that these Israelites are his brothers in the flesh, not the spirit. His
spiritual brothers are Christians.
Although Paul
understood the exchange he was suggesting was impossible, it was still the
sincere expression of his deep love for his fellow Jews.
Paul then listed seven spiritual privileges which belonged to the
people of Israel as God’s chosen nation: the adoption as sons (cf. Exo_4:22), the divine glory (cf. Exo_16:10; Exo_24:17;
Exo_40:34; 1Ki_8:11),
the covenants (Gen_15:18; 2Sa_7:12-16; Jer_31:31-34),
the receiving of the Law (Deu_5:1-22),
the temple worship (latreia, “sacred service,” which may also include
service in the tabernacle), and the promises (esp. of the coming
Messiah). This just means
that God had chosen the Hebrews (Israelites) to give the law to, and he had
chosen them to be a peculiar people set aside to worship Him. God's first
choice for the salvation message to go to was these Israelites.
Three times in the
New Testament the word “covenants” is used in the plural. All but one of God’s
covenants with man are eternal and unilateral, that is God promised to accomplish
something based on His own character and not on the response or actions of the
promised beneficiary. The 6 biblical covenants include:
(1) The covenant with Noah.
(2) The covenant with Abraham.
(3) The covenant of law given through Moses
at Sinai (The Mosaic Covenant)
(4) The priestly covenant
(5) The covenant of an eternal kingdom
through David’s greatest Son
(6) The New Covenant.
All but the Mosaic Covenant are
eternal and unilateral. (Unilateral means something which is done by only one
party) It is neither, since Israel’s sin abrogated it and it has been replaced
by the New Covenant.
Also the Israelites were
in the line of promise from its beginning in the patriarchs (cf. Mat_1:1-16; Rom_1:3)
to its fulfillment in the Messiah, who is God over all, forever praised!
Amen. The fathers
mentioned here are the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob through whom the
promises of the Messiah were fulfilled.
“Christ … God
blessed forever” is not intended primarily as a benediction, but as an affirmation
of the sovereignty and deity of Christ.
Romans 9:6-9
The Choice Illustrated
Isaac over Ishmael
The
failure of the Jews to respond to the gospel of Christ did not mean God’s
Word had failed. Instead this rejection was simply the current example of
the principle of God’s sovereign choice established in the Old Testament. Paul
reminded his readers of a truth he had presented earlier: For not all who
are descended from Israel are Israel, that is, spiritual Israel (cf. Rom_2:28-29). This refers specifically to the privileges and promises God
had revealed to Israel. Not all Israel who are of Israel means that not all the
physical descendants of Abraham are true heirs of the promise.
Those who follow
God are His children. The followers of God which are not true Jews are
considered grafted in Jews. Not those who were born into the house, but those
who chose to follow God.
Then
Paul gave three Old Testament illustrations of God’s sovereignty (Isaac and
Ishmael, Rom_9:7-9; Jacob and Esau, Rom_9:10-13; and Pharaoh, Rom_9:14-18). The first two show that God made a
sovereign choice among the physical descendants of Abraham in establishing the
spiritual line of promise. Ishmael, born to Hagar (Gen_16:1-16)
— and the six sons of Keturah as well (Gen_25:1-4)
— were Abraham’s descendants (sperma), but they were not counted as Abraham’s
children (tekna, “born ones”) in the line of promise. Instead,
as God told Abraham (Gen_21:12), It
is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned (lit., “in Isaac seed
[sperma] will be called to you”). Isaac was the son of promise. He
represented the Spirit. Abraham had a
son of the flesh (Ishmael). The promises God had made to Abraham came through
the Spirit, not through the flesh. You see from this that the Spirit of God and
the promises thereof are for the Spirit, and not for the flesh.
Galatians 3:29
"And if ye be Christ's then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to
the promise."
To illustrate the
truth of verse 6, Paul reminds his readers that even the racial and national
promises made to Abraham were not made to every physical descendant of his, but
only to those who came through Isaac.
Paul repeated the
principle for emphasis in different words: It is not the natural
children (lit., “the born ones of the flesh”) who are God’s children
(tekna, “born ones of God”), but it is the children
(tekna) of the promise who are regarded as Abraham’s
offspring (sperma).
“Children of the flesh” is a reference to Abrahams other children by Hagar and
Keturah who were not chosen to receive the national promises made to him.
“Children of God: Paul’s point
is just as not all of Abraham’s descendants who belonged to the physical people
of God, or national Israel - not all of those who are true children of Abraham
through Isaac are the true spiritual people of God and enjoy the promises made
to Abraham’s spiritual children.To be a physical descendant of Abraham is not enough; one must be chosen by God (cf. “chosen” in Rom_8:33) and must believe in Him (Rom_4:3, Rom_4:22-24). God’s assurance that the promise would come through Isaac, not Ishmael, was given to Abraham, see scripture from Gen. 18:10 “And he said, I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and, lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. And Sarah heard [it] in the tent door, which [was] behind him.”
Genesis 17:19 "And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, [and] with his seed after him." You see again here that the promise that God made to Abraham was to come through the child of promise (Isaac) the child of the spirit.
We can see the
chain of blessings from the following verse in Genesis 25:11 "And it came
to pass after the death of Abraham, that God blessed his son Isaac; and Isaac
dwelt by the well Lahai-roi."
Romans 9:10-13
Jacob over Esau
The
second Old Testament illustration of God’s sovereign choice is drawn from the
second generation of Jewish ancestry. Apparently God purposed to establish this
principle clearly at the beginning of His relationship with His Chosen People.
This illustration emphasizes God’s sovereignty even more than the first since
it involves God’s choice of one twin over another. (In the case of Abraham’s
sons, God chose the child of one woman over the child of another woman.) In
addition, in the case of Rebecca’s children God’s choice was indicated before
the twins were born or had done anything good or bad. This demonstrated
that God’s sovereign choice was not by works, even foreseen
works, but by Him who calls (cf. “called” in Rom_1:6;
Rom_8:28, Rom_8:30). Rebecca, also, had 2 sons; one of the
flesh (Esau) and a son who the promises of God would flow through (Jacob) whose
name would be changed to Israel.God’s plan (Rom_8:28; Rom_9:11), and not man’s works (Rom_4:2-6), is the basis of His election. Rebecca was informed, The older will serve the younger (cf. Gen_25:23), a divine choice confirmed by God’s declaration, Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated (cf. Mal_1:2-3). This business of election is sometimes hard to explain. We find that all through the Bible there are people who have been chosen out and called to do a certain thing for God. A very good example of that is John the Baptist who seemed to live for one purpose (to tell of the coming Messiah). God has elected that certain things will happen to get the job done that He wants done.
We
see in the verse above, that He has chosen Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to funnel
the spiritual blessings to all the believers in the world.
I Peter 1:2 "Elect
according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the
Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto
you, and peace, be multiplied."
We see from this,
that God actually knew from the foundation of the world who would choose to
follow Him and who would not. He did not predestine, He foreknew.
If we look back
into Genesis we find this about Esau and Jacob as this was told to Rebecca.
Gen. 25:23 “And the LORD said unto her, Two nations [are] in thy womb,
and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and [the one]
people shall be stronger than [the other] people; and the elder shall serve the
younger.”We see in this that Ishmael (son of the flesh) served Isaac (son of the spirit). We, also, see in this that Esau (the oldest son) served Jacob (the younger son). Since we are looking at the spiritual side of these lessons, we cannot overlook the fact that the law was given first to the physical house of Israel, and that grace was given to the spiritual house of Israel (Christians). Grace is better than the law.
Esau, the older, did not actually serve Jacob, his younger twin; but
Esau’s descendants, the Edomites, did (cf. 1Sa_14:47;
2Sa_8:14; 1Ki_11:15-16;
1Ki_22:47; 2Ki_14:7). Jacob and Esau was born approximately in
2005 B.C. Esau was the first born and when he was born, it was discovered that
Jacob was holding onto his heel. He was called "heel-grabber". It is
of Hebrew origin, and its meaning is "he who supplants, trips up another
and takes his place."
Esau was also the
father of the Edomites
We know that God
would not hate Esau without a cause. God hated Esau, not because of who he was,
but because he did not regard his birthright as being very valuable. In fact,
he thought so little of it that he sold it to his brother for a bowl of soup.
Malachi 1:2-3 “I
have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, wherein hast thou loved us? [Was]
not Esau Jacob's brother? Saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob,” “And I hated
Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the
wilderness.”
The blessing of God through
Abraham and Isaac then would come through the second son Jacob. From him, the
12 tribes of Israel would come. I say, again, God did not just hate Esau
without a cause. Esau turned his back on God.
Now having said
all of that let me explain the love and hate being mentioned.
Actual emotional
hatred for Esau and his offspring is not the point here. Genesis mentions no
divine hatred toward Esau but Obad. 1-21 indicated that the Lord’s hatred was
against Esau’s idolatrous descendants. In the same way, the Lord’s love for
Jacob refers to his descendants who were His sovereignly elected people through
whom the world’s Redeemer would come.
The love/hate
relationship language does not signify a comparative love in which God loved
Jacob more and Esau less. Rather, the context here speaks of love as “choosing
for intimate fellowship” and hate as “not choosing for intimate fellowship” in
the realm of redemption.
God’s
“love” for Jacob was revealed in His choice of Jacob and God’s “hatred” for
Esau was seen in His rejecting Esau for the line of promise. Hatred in this
sense is not absolute but relative to a higher choice (cf. Mat_6:24; Luk_14:26;
Joh_12:25).
Romans 9:14-18
With the words, What then shall we say? (cf. Rom_4:1; Rom_6:1;
Rom_8:31) Paul introduced the question
undoubtedly in his readers’ minds, Is God unjust in choosing Isaac over
Ishmael, and Jacob over Esau? The Greek negative particle (mē) with a question implies a negative response.
Paul responded in his usual emphatic way, Not at all! (mē genoito) If
this had been predestined some would say this was unfair, but this was not
predestined, only known ahead of time by God.
Paul had once
again anticipated his reader’s objection to Paul’s theology: If God were to
choose some people for salvation and pass over others apart from their merits
or actions, that would make god arbitrary and unfair.
The issue in such matters
is not justice but sovereign decision, as God’s word to Moses (Exo_33:19) quoted by Paul indicates. As the
sovereign God, He has the right to show mercy to whomever He chooses. It is God's world and we are His
creation. He can do with us whatever He chooses to do. We are His creation and
He is the Creator.
This is quoted
from Exodus 33:19. In response to the accusation that such a teaching about
God’s sovereign election is inconsistent with His fairness, Paul cites this
text from the Old Testament that clearly indicates that God is absolutely
sovereign and does elect who will be saved without violating His other attributes.
He determines who receives mercy.
In fact, He is not under
obligation to extend mercy to anyone. Therefore experiencing His
mercy does not… depend on man’s desire (lit., “the one willing”) or
effort (lit., “the one running”). No one deserves or can earn His mercy.
Many will seek to do the things of
God, but many will do these things for the wrong reasons. Just being a good
person and doing things their way according to how they believe, no matter what
they do, will not be shown mercy. We live in a society today that this has
become the norm. Many have created their own God instead of obeying God’s Word.
This will be a fatal mistake as many in that day will cry out “Lord, Lord” but
the Lord will tell them “Depart, I never knew you.”
It is God and He
alone who shows mercy. It is His gracious choice of certain people unto eternal
life. Salvation is not initiated by human choice and even faith is a gift of
God. Salvation is never merited by human effort.
I Peter 2:9-10 "But ye
[are] a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar
people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of
darkness into his marvelous light:" "Which in time past [were] not a
people, but [are] now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now
have obtained mercy."
We read, also,
Titus 3:5 "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according
to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the
Holy Ghost."
The Apostle Paul then
presented his third illustration, the Egyptian Pharaoh of the Exodus. To
him God said through Moses, I raised you up (i.e., brought you onto the
scene of history) to display My power in you and that My name might be
proclaimed in all the earth (cf. Exo_9:16).
God’s power (cf. Rom_9:22) was
demonstrated as He freed the Israelites from under Pharaoh’s hand. And other
nations heard about it and were awed (Exo_15:14-16;
Jos_2:10-11; Jos_9:9; 1Sa_4:8). This Old Testament quote proves that God
does sovereignly choose who will serve His purposes and how. The “raised thee
up” was often used to describe the rise of leaders and countries to positions
of prominence. Pharaoh no doubt thought his position and actions were of his
own free choice to accomplish his own purposes, but in reality he was there to
serve Go’s purpose.
We know that the 10 plagues that
came upon Egypt were for the purpose of discrediting the false gods of Egypt.
Egypt represents the world. God shows, through Pharaoh's rebellion, that the
gods of this world are no match for the real God. We see an almost identical
Scripture in the Old Testament account of this event. Exodus 9:16 "And in very deed for this [cause] have I raised thee up, for to shew [in] thee my power; and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth."
I Samuel 2:7-8 "The LORD maketh poor, and maketh rich: he bringeth low, and lifteth up." “He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, [and] lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set [them] among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth [are] the LORD'S, and he hath set the world upon them."
Look also at
Proverbs 16:4 "The LORD hath made all [things] for himself: yea, even the
wicked for the day of evil." This
all speaks for itself, we need no more comment here.
It is significant that
Paul introduced this quotation with the words, For the Scripture says,
for he equated the words of God with the words of Scripture. Paul concluded, God
has mercy on whom He wants to have mercy (cf. Rom_9:15)
and He hardens whom He wants to harden (“make stubborn”; cf. Exo_4:21; Exo_7:3;
Exo_9:12; Exo_10:27;
Exo_14:4, Exo_14:8;
cf. Exo_14:17). Have you even read that God hardened
someone’s heart and wondered why our God would do that to someone? Let’s
examine this a little closer.
The
Greek word for hardens literally means to make something hard, but is often
used figuratively to refer to making stubborn or obstinate. Then times Exodus
refers to God’s hardening Pharaoh’s heart, and other times to Pharaoh’s
hardening his own heart.
This
does not mean that God actively created unbelief or some other evil in
Pharaoh’s heart, but rather that He withdrew all the divine influences that
ordinarily acted as a restraint to sin and allowed Pharaoh’s wicked heart to
pursue its sin unabated.
Exodus
4:21" And the LORD said unto Moses, When thou goest to return into Egypt,
see that thou do all those wonders before Pharaoh, which I have put in thine
hand: but I will harden his heart, that he shall not let the people go."
We
also see this very same thing in Joshua 11:20 "For it was of the LORD to
harden their hearts, that they should come against Israel in battle, that he
might destroy them utterly, [and] that they might have no favor, but that he
might destroy them, as the LORD commanded Moses."
We
are not to question God's motives. In both of these instances, this taught us
that God is even in control of Satan and all his evil forces. God can cause
them to destroy themselves especially by creating fear in their hearts by
allowing them to believe a delusion. Remember the story of Gideon?
Because of God’s choice,
Pharaoh then hardened his own heart (Exo_7:13-14,
Exo_7:22; Exo_8:15,
Exo_8:19, Exo_8:32;
Exo_9:7, Exo_9:34-35).
All this shows that God chooses and works sovereignly, but not arbitrarily. Yet
Pharaoh was responsible for his actions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment