1 Corinthians 16:1
Counsel concerning the collection for the poor
The flow of the previous chapter, from a
prolonged discourse on doctrinal matters to a concluding exhortation on
practical diligence, moved smoothly to a discussion of a practical expression
of that faith — care for the needs of others and in particular, the needy in
Jerusalem.
At this
appropriate juncture, Paul took up the Corinthian inquiry (cf. 1Co_7:1) concerning a proposed collection for
God’s people (cf. 1Co_1:2) in
Jerusalem (1Co_15:3). The Corinthians
had apparently heard about the collection through members of the Galatian
churches, the oldest of all the Pauline-planted churches (Acts 13:14-14:23)
in Derbe, Lystra, Iconium, and Pisidian Antioch. Paul’s instruction to them was
repeated to the Corinthians.
Paul was concerned about the poverty stricken in Jerusalem. It seemed they had
somewhat of an obligation to Jerusalem, since the beginning of the church was
there.
The “Collection for the saints” is an
offering for destitute believers in the over populated famine stricken city of
Jerusalem. Paul had previously solicited funds from the churches of Galatia, Macedonia,
and Achaia.
1 Corinthians 16:2
Paul never
used the word “tithe” when he discussed giving, even though he gave more
attention to giving than any other New Testament writer. Giving should be a
systematic, weekly practice on Sunday when the church meets together. Giving
was also to be proportionate — in keeping with one’s income (cf. Act_11:29). The income of some would permit them
to give a greater proportion, while others, due to their few resources and
other constraints on them, would be limited to lesser contributions. What was
important was that giving be a unified ministry with each one
participating, regardless of his income. Then when it came time to deliver the
contributions to the saints in Jerusalem, no last-minute collections
would need to be made, and the gift could be sent off gladly, not
grudgingly (2Co_9:5) — as would be true
if it were wrung out by emotional appeals or personal pressure. The church of the Lord Jesus Christ met
on the first day of the week. The Christians practice first fruits. This is
just saying take up a collection when you meet and have it ready. Each person
should give according to what they can afford to give.
This evidences that the early church met
on Sunday (Acts 20:7). The point is that giving must occur regularly, not just
when one feels generous, particularly led to do so, or instructed to do so for
some special purpose.
“As he may prosper”: No required amount
or percentage for giving to the Lord’s work is specified in the New Testament.
All giving to the Lord is to be free will giving and completely discretionary
(see Luke 6:38; 2 Cor. 9:6-8).
This is not to be confused with the Old
Testament required giving of 3 tithes which totaled about 23 percent annually
to fund the national government of Israel, take care of public festivals, and
provide welfare. Modern parallels to the Old Testament tithe are found in the
taxation system of countries. Old Testament giving to God was not regulated as
to amount.
1 Corinthians 16:3-4
Paul’s
practice in money matters was scrupulously aboveboard. Not only did he avoid
solicitation for himself (cf. 1Co_9:12,
1Co_9:15), but also when he acted to
meet the needs of others he avoided direct involvement in handling the gift.
He preferred instead that individuals from the various contributing
congregations elect representatives to bear their gift (cf. 2Co_8:19-21) whom he might then accompany
to the presentation. Paul
did not want to handle the money himself, so he asked that they choose some
honorable member, who would go and take the offering to the poor in Jerusalem.
Paul is praising them for their help, in the word "liberality". Paul
had really not planned to go with them. He said it did not matter if he were
going; he still wanted someone else to carry the offering. He would let the
chosen person travel with him, but he definitely did not want to carry the
offering himself.
1 Corinthians 16:5
Counsel concerning future visits
The mention of his planned arrival in connection
with the collection sparked another brief digression on the subject of future
visits.
It was
Paul’s plan to leave Ephesus, his place of ministry at that time (1Co_16:8), and journey through Macedonia,
the region north of Corinth where the churches of Philippi, Thessalonica, and
presumably Berea (cf. Act_20:4, a
delegate from Berea accompanied Paul) flourished. They too were planning to
make a contribution to the needy in Jerusalem (cf. 2Co_8:1-4).
Paul tried to go back to the
churches he had started to check and see how they were doing. Paul really
wanted to wait a short time to let them get the problems in their church taken
care of before he came. He loved these people and would come as soon as he was
in their vicinity.
At the end of a 3 year stay in Ephesus,
Paul wrote his letter and probably gave it to Timothy to deliver, v.10. Paul
originally planned to follow Timothy a short while after, visiting Corinth on
the way to and from Macedonia. He had to change his plan and visit only after a
longer stay in Ephesus, then on to Corinth after Macedonia, to stay for a
while.
1 Corinthians 16:6-7
On that
journey (cf. Act_19:21) Paul hoped to
be able to spend some time with the Corinthians, possibly as long as the
winter since travel by sea in that season was ill-advised (cf. Act_27:9-44). Paul did come and stay with them for a while. They loved
Paul and many of them would probably travel with him as he left. This would
show how badly they felt about his leaving. This, in fact, he eventually
did but not on the schedule here set forth. This change of plans became a
source of trouble for him with the Corinthians later (cf. 2 Cor. 1:15-2:1).
What Paul meant by the words you can help me on my journey is clarified
later (1Co_16:11). He desired that his
departure be marked by “peace,” which would be in keeping with the Lord’s will
(cf. Jas_4:15). Notice that Paul says, “if the Lord
permit”. He went where the Lord sent him. He stayed until the Lord said it is
time to move on. Paul wanted to stay in Corinth for a while, but would be
subject to the wishes of God.
1 Corinthians 16:8-9
For the time
being, Paul intended to stay on at Ephesus in ministry, where the
opportunities and the opposition were both great. Paul had spent a great deal of time at
Ephesus. This could have been the trip when Paul had trouble with the
silversmiths. Pentecost meant a great deal to the Christians, as well as the
Jews. At Pentecost was when the Holy Spirit fell on 120, and they were all
baptized in the Holy Ghost. One or the other of these situations may have
arisen while he was writing this letter (cf. 1Co_4:19).
It says something about Paul’s perception of his ministry that the presence of
opposition was a sign to him of the viability of his labor and reason for
pressing on, not running away (cf. Act_19:30-31).
Paul was travelling from place to
place and establishing churches along the way. He faced much opposition from
the Jews during these trips. He was not only fighting all types of idol
worship, but his greatest opposition was from the Jewish leaders themselves.
The opportunities were great, but the "adversaries" {enemies} were
many, as well.
Many adversaries: The apostle seems to
have in mind his pending trip through Macedonia and is accounting for why he is
staying a little longer in Ephesus.
Perhaps no New Testament church had such
fierce opposition as the one in Ephesus (See 2 Cor. 1:8-10 where he described
his experience in Ephesus, Acts 19:1-21) In spite of that opposition, the door
for the gospel was open wide (2 Cor. 2:12-13 where Paul also had an open door,
but no heart to remain and preach) and Paul stayed. At the end of the
experience of opposition described in 2. Cor. 1:8-10, he wrote 1 Corinthians.
Those who
opposed him in Corinth (1Co_4:18-21)
probably took note of this.
1 Corinthians 16:10-11
In the
meantime Paul intended to send his beloved assistant Timothy to Corinth.
The younger man sometimes traveled in Paul’s place (cf. Php_2:19-24). That Timothy might have cause to
fear while ministering in Corinth confirms, as this letter indicates, that
working with the Corinthian church was no picnic. Timothy had been trained in the ways of the
Lord by his mother and his grandmother, but a great deal of his ministry
training had been from Paul. Paul thought of Timothy as his son in the spirit.
When Timothy ministered, it was as if Paul were ministering. Timothy was an
extension of the teachings of Paul. Paul is saying, it was the next best thing
to him being with them himself.
Paul had sent him with Erastus to
Macedonia, Acts 19:22 and then he was to travel to Corinth, perhaps to carry
this epistle. “Without fear”: i.e. intimidation or frustration by believers in
Corinth.
However, it probably says more about the
character of Timothy, a man devoted to Christ (Php_2:19-21)
but lacking Paul’s robust boldness (cf. 1Ti_4:12;
2Ti_1:7-8; 2Ti_2:1).
This is just Paul
giving the highest recommendation to Timothy to those in Corinth. Paul tells
them not to hate him. Perhaps, Paul was afraid they would be jealous, because
he thought so much of Timothy.
The identity of the brothers accompanying
Timothy is not clear. It appears that Timothy went out from Ephesus with
Erastus (Act_19:22). They may have been
joined by some of the men who later composed Paul’s traveling party for
delivering the collection (Act_20:4).
1 Corinthians 16:12
The last of
the Corinthian questions (cf. 1Co_7:10)
concerned Apollos. They apparently inquired about the possibility of a
return visit from him. Paul said he had strongly urged Apollos to do
this but that the gifted Alexandrian had decided to stay on in Ephesus with
Paul, and not join Timothy and Erastus in their trip (Act_19:22). We must remember, again, that they had written a letter to
Paul, and this is an answer to that letter. These Christians here at Corinth had
probably asked in the letter for Apollos to come and minister to them. He was,
possibly, one of their favorite ministers. It, also, seems that he was
ministering somewhere else at the time and could not come.
Paul felt Apollos should accompany the
other brothers, Timothy and Erastus, to Corinth. Apollos refused, staying in
Ephesus longer. Paul respected his convictions.
Earlier in
the letter, Paul had described himself and Apollos as fellow workers under God
(1Co_3:9). This verse bears eloquent
tribute to the fact that Paul conducted himself not as a master but as a
partner with others who labored in ministry.
1 Corinthians 16:13-14
Paul gives 5 final commands. The
Corinthian are to be alert, firm, mature, strong and loving.
Conclusion
Exhortation on appropriate conduct and
commendation
Paul began
the conclusion with a pointed exhortation along a fivefold line. The command, Be
on your guard (grēgoreite) might be rendered “be diligent” in carrying out
the will of God (cf. 1Co_15:58, “give
yourselves fully to the work of the Lord”). In view of the Corinthians’
susceptibility to false teachers (cf. 2Co_11:3)
the exhortation to stand firm in the faith was a timely reminder (cf. 1Co_15:1, 1Co_15:58).
So too were the closing exhortations (similar to the Gr. text of several Pss.,
e.g., Psa_27:14; Psa_31:24) to be men of courage and be
strong, that is, marked by maturity (cf. 1Co_14:20)
and not infants easily swept aside (cf. Eph_4:14).
This is a subject that we should
dwell on quite a lot. It is just as important to remain in the salvation you
have received as it is to be saved in the first place. To "stand
fast", means not to be blown by every wind of doctrine. Be strong as men.
“The faith”: The Christian faith, i.e.,
sound doctrine as in Phil. 1:27, 1 Tim. 6:12; Jude 3.
That sort of diligence and commitment is
required if everything is to be done in love (cf. 1 Cor.
12:31b-14:1). "Charity",
here, is speaking of love. Paul is trying to teach them that Christianity is a
relationship with the Lord in your heart. He is explaining to do things,
because you love and not because of necessity.
1 Corinthians 16:15-16
Achaia was the
Roman province extending over central and southern Greece of which Corinth was
the capital. Those in the household of Stephanas were among the first
converts in the region (cf. Act_17:34,
for some in Athens believed), and they were among those who assumed
responsibility for the general welfare of the church. Paul is reminding them here that these
were some of the very first Christians. They, also, had totally dedicated
themselves to the work of the Lord. Paul, possibly, was saying, even though
they wrote me of these problems in the church, you must not have hard feelings
about them. These things needed to be settled once for all.
The members of the household of Stephanas
were among the first converts in Corinth, which is located in Achaia, the
southern province of Greece. Stephanas was one of the Corinthians believers
Paul baptized personally, and was visiting with Paul in Ephesus at the time
this epistle was written. With Fortunatus and Achaicus, he probably delivered
the earlier letter from Corinth mentioned in 7:1.
Sometimes Paul appointed elders (Act_14:23) but in this instance members of
Stephanas’ household voluntarily took on the responsibility (cf. 1Ti_3:1). Paul recognized their position as
ordained by God and urged others to submit to them. Paul is explaining that
the new converts should listen to those who had been in the work longer and who
had dedicated their lives to the work of the Lord. One primary qualification for church leadership was a willingness to
serve (cf. Mat_23:11; Luk_22:26). To those who labored with this
spirit, submission on the part of others in the church was due.
1 Corinthians 16:17-18
By their
very presence, three men from the Corinthian church — Stephanas, Fortunatus,
and Achaicus — were able to refresh and encourage Paul despite the fact
that they probably also brought confirmation of the bad news earlier reported
by Chloe’s people (1Co_1:11). These men
were the probable bearers of the letter to which Paul had responded to. These were people who had come to
minister to them in the things they were weak in. They had filled in the gaps
in your spiritual learning.
Paul was glad about the arrival of his 3
friends in Ephesus who went there to be with him. The Corinthian were to give
those men respect or their service to the Lord. One really great thing that
happens when a group of old seasoned ministers get together, is that we refresh
each other's spirit. There is no room for jealousy in the ministry. Meet with
other ministers, and share what God has shown you, and all will benefit by it.
1 Corinthians 16:19
Salutation, imprecation, and benediction
The
churches… of Asia, perhaps those indicated in Revelation 2-3,
joined with Paul in sending greetings to their sister church in Corinth
(cf. 1Co_1:2). Aquila and Priscilla
were tentmakers whom Paul met in Corinth and with whom he lived. They had
followed Paul to Ephesus and remained there in ministry, making their house
available as a meeting place (cf. Rom_16:3-5).
We remember that Priscilla and
Aquila were a husband and wife that Paul had lived with. In fact, Paul had been
a tent maker with them to make a living. They were both teachers of the Word of
God and they, also, opened their home as a church. They were all three
responsible for founding the church in Corinth and in Ephesus.
The following Scripture shows that both
of them taught. Acts 18:26 "And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue:
whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto [them], and
expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly."
They had become good friends with Paul,
since he stayed in their house during his first ministry in Corinth, Acts
18:1-3. He may have stayed with them the entire year and a half.
“In their house”: The early church used
homes of believers for worship and many other activities.
They would,
of course, know and be known by many in the Corinthian church.
1 Corinthians 16:20
All the brothers may refer to those from the Corinthian church in Ephesus at the time
of writing (1Co_1:11; 1Co_16:17), or to believers in Ephesus who met
in a house(s) other than that of Aquila and Priscilla, or simply to the
collective community of Christians in the province of Asia.
The holy
kiss (cf. 2Co_13:12; Rom_16:16; 1Th_5:25;
1Pe_5:14) was primarily a symbolic
expression of the love, forgiveness, and unity which should exist among
Christians. As such, it became associated with the celebration of the Lord’s
Supper as a prelude to its observance. It was a mark of the familial bond which
united believers. It was not
unusual in these days for a man to kiss another man in greeting. He did not
kiss him on the lips, but on the cheek. Notice the type of this kiss {holy}.
Paul is saying; do not be distant to your brothers in Christ. Show that you
care for each other.
This was a pure expression of Christian
love between men with men and women with women, with no sexual overtones.
There is no
indication that it was restricted to one’s own sex in the New Testament era
(cf. Luk_7:37, Luk_7:45). The suggestion to separate the sexes
for the exchange of the kiss arose in the late second century due to concern
about criticism from non-Christians and the danger of erotic abuse. By the
third century it seems that the sexes were separated, and by the fourth century
the clergy and laity were also kept apart. Such, however, was apparently not
the case in the New Testament church where love for one another was openly
expressed.
1 Corinthians 16:21
At this
point Paul stopped dictating the letter (cf. Rom_16:22;
Gal_6:11) and wrote the final words
himself. Paul is just saying
that this is not second-hand information, but from him personally. He greets
them personally.
Paul dictated the main part of the letter
to a scribe, but finished and signed it himself.
1 Corinthians 16:22
Paul’s
personal note began with a passionate warning probably aimed at false teachers
(cf. 1Co_12:3) whom he believed to be
already present in the congregation (cf. 2Co_11:3-4).
The verb love (philei) is related to the noun philēmati for “kiss” (1Co_16:20).
It expresses adoration and devotion, qualities absent in false brethren. Paul
invoked God’s wrath on these false teachers (cf. Gal_1:8-9)
and in the same breath appealed to Christ to return (cf. Mat_7:21-23; Rev_22:20). "Anathema" seems to mean
excommunicated. Love of the Lord and the Lord's people is really the essence of
Christianity. To not love the Lord would mean that you had rejected the Lord.
You would just automatically cut yourself off, if you did not love the Lord. Of
course, I think that is terribly important. Come, O Lord! Renders
the Greek words marana
tha (“Maranatha”), which
transliterate the Aramaic “Lord, come.”
1 Corinthians 16:23-24
To the
congregation of Christians in Corinth, Paul invoked what they sorely needed,
the continued grace of the Lord Jesus (cf. 1Co_1:4).
This statement is a trademark of
Paul. This is like speaking a benediction on them. It is actually a prayer of
Paul's for them to continue in the unmerited favor of the Lord. He assured
them of what they hardly deserved, his fervent though unrequited (cf. 2Co_6:11-13; 2Co_12:15)
love (agapē) He embraced the disunited lot of them (cf. 1Co_1:10) as their spiritual father in Christ
Jesus (1Co_4:15). Paul is just saying I love you, you are
my spiritual children. Paul knows the only way to truly love people is to allow
the Lord to love them through you. Amen, just means, so be it.
The
first epistle to the Corinthians was written from Philippi by Stephanas and
Fortunatus and Achaicus and Timotheus as dictated by the Apostle Paul.
0 comments:
Post a Comment