CLICK HERE FOR BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND MYSPACE LAYOUTS »

Wednesday, September 18, 2024

Book of 1 John Chapter 4 Vs. 2

Test the Spirits


1 John 4:2 "Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:"

Hereby know ye... Every spirit inspiring any teacher to deny the incarnation, His passion, death, physical resurrection, and physical ascension to heaven is not of God, and is antichrist (1Jhn. 4:2-3; see, John 21:14). John gives a measuring stick to determine whether the propagator of the message is a demon spirit or the Holy Spirit.

Hereby (ἐν τούτῳ)

Lit., in this. Characteristic of John. See John 8:35; 15:8; 16:30; 1Jhn. 2:5; 3:24; 4:13; 5:2; 3:16; 3:19; 4:2. The expression points to what follows, “if we keep His commandments,” yet with a covert reference to that idea as generally implied in the previous words concerning fellowship with God and walking in the light. Ref. 1Jhn. 2:3.


know ye (γινῶσκετε)

Perceive. Literally, on account of the fact of His knowing. John describes the Lord's knowledge by two words which it is important to distinguish. Γινώσκειν, as here, implies acquired knowledge; knowledge which is the result of discernment and which may be enlarged. This knowledge may be drawn from external facts (John 5:6; 6:15) or from spiritual sympathy (John 10:14, 10:27; 17:25). Εἰδέναι (John 1:26) implies absolute knowledge: the knowledge of intuition and of satisfied conviction. Hence it is used of Christ's knowledge of divine things (John 3:11; 5:32; 7:29), Of the facts of His own being (John 6:6; 8:14; 13:1), and of external facts (John 6:61, 6:64; 13:11). In John 21:17 the two words appear together. Peter says to Jesus, appealing to His absolute knowledge, “Thou knowest οἶδας all things:” appealing to his discernment, “Thou knowest or perceivest γινώσκεις that I love Thee. See on John 2:24.


confesseth (ὁμολογεῖ)

The word which is used elsewhere of open confession of Christ before men (Mat. 10:32; Rom. 10:9); of John's public declaration that he was not the Christ (John 1:20); of Herod's promise to Salome in the presence of his guests (Mat. 14:7). Here, therefore, of Christ's open, public declaration as Judge of the world. “There is great authority in this saying,” remarks Bengel. Mat. 7:23.


Jesus Christ is... This is the first test of a true teacher: they acknowledge and proclaim that Jesus is God incarnate in human flesh. The Greek construction does not mean that they confessing Christ as having come to earth, but that they confess that He came in the flesh to the earth, i.e., His human body was physically real.

that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh (Ἱησοῦν Χριστὸν ἐν σαρκὶ ἐληλυθότα)

Lit., Jesus Christ having come, etc. The whole phrase forms the direct object of the verb confesseth.


Both the full humanity and full deity of Jesus must be equally maintained by the teacher who is to be considered genuinely of the Spirit. The Holy Spirit testifies to the true nature of the Son, while Satan and his forces distort and deny that true nature. John accentuates the crucial importance of sound doctrine expressed in God's Word as the only absolute and trustworthy standard (Isa. 8:20).

To confess Jesus as the Christ the Messiah, the Anointed One, is to have Him as your Savior. This, to me, is saying, we must believe that the Word of God took on the form of flesh and dwelt among us. He was not a man; He was just housed in the body of a man here on the earth.

Inside that flesh, dwelt the Spirit of God. He was Emmanuel God with us. Notice, also, that people like you and me are spirits, as well. The part of us that contains life is our spirit. God had made a clay doll in the beginning from the dust of the earth. We were mere vacant houses of flesh. God breathed the breath of life in us, and we were alive.

Of God

Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost. 1Cor. 12:3.


He then gave us the ability to choose good and evil when He made us living souls. We must know who Jesus is, before we can have faith in Him for salvation. Man's blood or an animal's blood cannot cleanse you from all unrighteousness. The blood of God cleanses us from our sins.

The blood of a child comes from the Father. God the Holy Spirit hovered over Mary, and she conceived of God. Mary furnished the body. It was not Mary's blood that flowed through that body, but God's. We must believe Jesus to be God manifest in the flesh to be saved.

Every spirit which acknowledges.

Yechiel Lichtenstein writes, "Yochanan did not say 'believes,' because a person cannot be recognized by his thoughts, only by his confession."

Yeshua the Messiah came as a human being.

One of the earliest heresies was that of the Docetists, who taught that the Messiah only appeared to be a human being. They considered human flesh on too low a plane for so exalted a figure as the Son of God. This heresy persists explicitly in theosophy and in sects based on Eastern religious teachings which speak of the Christ as a spiritual entity which, in effect, masqueraded as human but was actually a far higher being. It persists in a far more widespread fashion in the implicit popular theology of much of the Christian Church, which in emphasizing Yeshua's divinity practically ignores his humanity and portrays him as if he floated around the Holy Land several feet off the ground. For a Jew there may be difficulty in regarding the Messiah as divine, but none whatever in regarding him as human; quite the contrary, the idea of a Messiah who is not a human being is virtually meaningless within the thought-framework of Judaism.

Sunday, September 8, 2024

Book of Joel Chapter 3 Vs. 12

 The Lord Judges the Nations


Let the heathen be wakened, and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat: for there will I sit to judge all the heathen round about. Joel 3:12


Let the Heathen... That is, let the enemies of Christ and his church be aroused from that state of security in which they are, and prepare for their own defense. For in such a state the antichristian powers will be before their destruction (see Rev. 18:7).

גּוֹי

gôy, גּוֹיִם

gôyim, הַגּוֹיִם

hāggôyim

A masculine noun meaning nation, people, Gentiles, country. The word is used to indicate a nation or nations in various contexts and settings: it especially indicates the offspring of Abraham that God made into a nation (Gen. 12:2) and thereby set the stage for Israel's appearance in history as a nation (Gen. 18:18; Psm. 106:5). Israel was to be a holy nation (Exo. 19:6). Even the descendants of Abraham that did not come from the seed of Isaac would develop into nations (Gen. 21:13). God can create a nation, even a holy nation like Israel, through the descendants of the person whom He chooses, as He nearly does in the case of Moses when Israel rebels (Exo. 32:10). Edom refers to Israel and Judah as two separate nations (Eze. 35:10), but God planned for them to be united forever into one nation (Eze. 37:22). Then they would become the head of the nations (Deut. 28:12). In this overall literary, theological, and historical context, it is clear that Israel would share common ancestors and would have a sufficient increase in numbers to be considered a nation. It would have a common place of habitation and a common origin, not only in flesh and blood, but in their religious heritage. It would share a common history, culture, society, religious worship, and purposes for the present and the future.

This noun is used to mean nations other than Israel as well; pagan, Gentile, or heathen nations (Exo. 9:24; 34:10; Eze. 5:6-8), for all the earth and all the nations belong to God (cf. Exo. 19:5). Israel was to keep herself from the false religions, unclean practices, and views of these nations (Ezra 6:21). In the plural, the noun may indicate the generic humankind (Isa. 42:6). In a few instances, the word refers to a group of people rather than to a nation (2Kgs. 6:18; Psm. 43:1; Isa. 26:2), although the exact translation is difficult in these cases.

The word is used in a figurative sense to refer to animals or insects, such as in Joel 1:6 where it depicts locusts.

be awakened...

ער

ûr

I. A verb meaning to stir, to arouse, to awaken. It is used of raising something or someone to action, of agitating someone, of motivating him or her. It is used of stirring oneself to action (Jdg. 5:12; Psm. 57:8, 9); especially of the Lord's arousing Himself or His arm (Psm. 7:6, 7; 59:4, 5; Isa. 51:9). In its passive use, it means to be stirred up (Jer. 6:22; 25:32; Zec. 4:1). It means to rouse someone to action (Zec. 9:13); to use a weapon (2Sam. 23:18); to stir up a nest of young birds (a figure of the Lord toward His people) (Deut. 32:11).

and come up... Let them bestir themselves and exert all the rigor and strength they have. Let them come in high spirits against the people of God; let them invade the holy land, and come even to the valley of Jehoshaphat. And, when come thither, let them, descend into the place appointed for their ruin.

The land of Judea being said to be higher than other countries, going to it is generally expressed by going up to it. Otherwise, it is more usual to say that men go down to a valley than come up to it; and mention being made again of this valley, shows that the same thing is referred to here (as in Joel 3:2).

These words are said in answer to the petition (in Joel 3:11); for they are spoken by the Lord, as appears by what follows.

עָלָה

ālāh

A verb meaning to go up, to ascend, to take away, to lift, to offer. This Hebrew word carries with it the connotation of an upward motion. It is used generically to denote an ascension to a higher place (Num. 13:17); a departure in a northerly direction (Gen. 45:25); the flight of a bird (Isa. 40:31); the springing up of plants (Isa. 34:13); the preference of one thing above another (Psm. 137:6); and the offering of a sacrifice (Jdg. 6:28; 2Kgs. 3:20). Theologically significant is the fact that this verb is used in relationship to a person's appearance before God. One must go up to stand before the Lord (Exo. 34:24; see also Gen. 35:1).

to...

אֵל

ēl, אֶל

el

A preposition meaning to, into, concerning. It has the basic meaning of toward. It is used in all kinds of situations indicating direction (Gen. 2:19; 16:11; 18:7; Lev. 1:16). It is used metaphorically to refer to speaking to someone (Gen. 8:15) or sexual intercourse (Gen. 16:2; Num. 25:1). It indicates direction when things face each other (Num. 12:8). Its use in the idiom hinneni ’ēl indicates motion toward (Gen. 4:8). Other meanings according to context are as far as (Jer. 51:9); into (Jon. 1:5); to sit at (Gen. 24:11; 1Kgs. 13:20). Used figuratively, it can mean with regard to something (2Sam. 1:24). When used with other prepositions, it indicates direction or location according to the preposition it is being combined with (Jos. 15:13; 17:4; 1Kgs. 8:6; 2Kgs. 9:18).

It is used in place of or interchangeably for the preposition ‛al and takes on the meaning of upon, on (Jos. 5:14; Jdg. 6:37).

the valley...

עֵמֶק

ēmeq

I. A masculine noun designating a valley, a plain. It refers to a vale, a valley, a lowland, the opposite of hilly or mountainous land. It is used of this kind of land in general (Isa. 22:7; Jer. 31:40). It is used of the Jordan Valley area (Jos. 13:19, 13:27). It was a place where chariotry would be used in battle (Jos. 17:16). Many specific places have names featuring ‛ēmeq, valley, e.g., the Valley of Siddim, the Valley of the King, etc. (Gen. 14:17).

II. The phrase ‛ēmeq qeṣiys occurs in Jos. 18:21 as the proper name Emek Keziz.

of Jehoshaphat...

יְהשָׁפָט

yehôšāp̱āṭ

A proper noun designating Jehoshaphat:

A. A good king of Judah, son of Asa. His name means the Lord has judged. He ruled twenty-five years (872-852 B.C.). He tried to keep Judah and Israel united as one people (1Kgs. 22:4-5). He kept peace (1Kgs. 22:44) and followed the Lord in every way (1Kgs. 22:41-43), consulting the true prophet of God for leadership (1Kgs. 22:7; 2Kgs. 3:11-25). He had the Law of God taught throughout Judah (2Chr. 17:1-9). He removed religious male prostitutes from the land (1Kgs. 4:6). He built ships for commerce, but they were all wrecked at Ezion Geber (1Kgs. 22:48). His son Jehoram succeeded him. The Books of 1 and 2 Chronicles consider his reign a great success as well.

B. The father of Jehu who was king in Israel (2Kgs. 9:2). His father was Nimshi.

C. He was the recorder or secretary under David and son of Ahilud (2Sam. 8:16).

D. He was one of Solomon's twelve area governors. He was over Issachar and was son of Paruah (1Kgs. 4:17).

E. A valley into which the Lord will bring all nations for judgment (Joel 3:2). The name means the Lord judges. The Lord will judge them with respect to how they treated His people, Israel. It appears to be a symbolic use of the term or name or refers also to this valley near Jerusalem.

for...

כִּי

kiy

A demonstrative particle meaning because, for, that, when, whenever; indeed, even; if; even when, even though. It is used in various ways and must be translated accordingly. In every case, the context in which the word functions will be the key to translating correctly. Here is a listing of the major ways it is used: as a conjunction meaning because (Gen. 3:14); for (Psm. 6:2, 6:5); that (Gen. 1:10; 1Kgs. 21:15); as a conjunctive time or condition indicator, when or if (Gen. 4:12); in a clause of condition, it means if, in fact, or in case (Job 7:13); as a demonstrative particle translated as yes, indeed, surely (Gen. 18:20; 1Sam. 14:44); truly, especially found in oaths (Gen. 42:16); used with ’im (H518) . . . . . . , it means if . . . then (Isa. 7:9); in combination with kî ’az, it is best rendered as then; kî ‛attāh usually means for them (Job 3:13). After a negative clause, is best rendered as rather (Gen. 3:6; 17:5; 24:4); preceded by the negative lō’, it is no, but . . . In clauses that concede something, it has the sense of even though, although, even when (Ecc. 4:14). It is used to show comparison when used in the construction . . . kēn, as . . . so (Isa. 55:9).

there...

שָׁם

šām

An adverb meaning there, were, in that direction. It indicates a place or the place where: there (Gen. 2:8, 2:12); where (Job 39:30); where, when preceded with the relative ašer (Gen. 2:11; Exo. 20:21); to were, thither after motion verbs (Deut. 1:37; Jdg. 19:15). It often has he ה on the end indicating motion there, to a place (Gen. 19:20, Deut. 1:38). With min (H4480) on the front, it means from there miššām (Gen. 2:10; 11:8-9; 12:8). It can express the source or origin of something, e.g., man from the ground (Gen, 3:23); Philistines from . . . (Gen. 10:14; Jdg. 19:18); a goat from the flock (Gen. 27:9).

will I sit... This not only refers to Armageddon, but to the judgment of the nations (Mat. 25:31-46). There gathered together from all parts. The allusion is to a judge upon the bench, sitting to hear and try causes, and pass a definitive sentence. And here it signifies the execution of that sentence; such a pleading the cause of his people, as to take vengeance and inflict just punishment upon their enemies (see Psm. 9:4).

יָשַׁב

yāšaḇ

A verb meaning to sit, to dwell, to inhabit, to endure, to stay. Apparently, to sit is the root idea, and other meanings are derived from this. The subject of the verb may be God, human, animal (Jer. 50:39), or inanimate matter. The word sometimes emphasizes the location of persons, whether they were sitting under a tree (Jdg. 6:11; 1Kgs. 19:4) or in a house (2Kgs. 6:32). It could also reflect a person's position: one sat as a judge (Prov. 20:8; Isa. 28:6); as a widow (Gen. 38:11); or on a throne as king (Exo. 12:29; 2Kgs. 13:13). Sometimes it indicated one's companions; one sits with scoffers (Psm. 1:1); or with the elders of the land (Prov. 31:23). The word may signify to dwell, either temporarily (Lev. 23:42) or in a permanent dwelling (Gen. 4:16; Zeph. 2:15). Sometimes the word means that an object or person stays in a limited area (Exo. 16:29); or abides for a period of time (Lev. 12:4-5; 2Sam. 6:11); or for eternity (Psm. 9:7, 8; 102:12, 13; 125:1). The years are even said to sit, that is, to pass (1Kgs. 22:1).

to judge...

שָׁפַט

šāp̱aṭ

A verb meaning to judge, to govern. This word, though often translated as judge, is much more inclusive than the modern concept of judging and encompasses all the facets and functions of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. Consequently, this term can be understood in any one of the following ways. It could designate, in its broadest sense, to function as ruler or governor. This function could be fulfilled by individual judges (Jdg. 16:31; 1Sam. 7:16); the king (1Kgs. 3:9); or even God Himself (Psm. 50:6; 75:7, 8); since He is the source of authority (cf. Rom. 13:1) and will eventually conduct all judgments (Psm. 96:13). In a judicial sense, the word could also indicate, because of the exalted status of the ruler, the arbitration of civil, domestic, and religious disputes (Deut. 25:1). As before, this function could be fulfilled by the congregation of Israel (Num. 35:24); individual judges (Exo. 18:16; Deut. 1:16); the king (1Sam. 8:5-6, 8:20); or even God Himself (Gen. 16:5; 1Sam. 24:12, 13, 24:15, 16). In the executive sense, it could denote to execute judgment, to bring about what had been decided. This could be in the form of a vindication (Psm. 10:18; Isa. 1:17, 1:23); or a condemnation and punishment (Eze. 7:3, 7:8; 23:45).

all...

כֹּל

kōl

A particle meaning each, every, all, everything, the whole, entire. It has an inclusive meaning of all or every one of something. Its exact meaning must be discerned from its usage in its context. Some representative samplings will help: With the definite article, it means the whole or everything of something (Ecc. 11:5); used before a definite noun, it expresses the whole of that noun, the whole earth (Gen. 9:19); whole people (Gen. 41:40). Used after a noun, it can refer to the whole or entirety of the preceding noun (2Sam. 2:9); before a plural noun, it usually means all, all the nations (Isa. 2:2); before a collective noun, it means all or every, all people (Gen. 7:21). Before a singular noun, it means every (Est. 3:8). Other nuances of its use can be discerned from studying its context closely.

the heathen...

גּוֹי

gôy, גּוֹיִם

gôyim, הַגּוֹיִם

hāggôyim

A masculine noun meaning nation, people, Gentiles, country. The word is used to indicate a nation or nations in various contexts and settings: it especially indicates the offspring of Abraham that God made into a nation (Gen. 12:2) and thereby set the stage for Israel's appearance in history as a nation (Gen. 18:18; Psm. 106:5). Israel was to be a holy nation (Exo. 19:6). Even the descendants of Abraham that did not come from the seed of Isaac would develop into nations (Gen. 21:13). God can create a nation, even a holy nation like Israel, through the descendants of the person whom He chooses, as He nearly does in the case of Moses when Israel rebels (Exo. 32:10). Edom refers to Israel and Judah as two separate nations (Eze. 35:10), but God planned for them to be united forever into one nation (Eze. 37:22). Then they would become the head of the nations (Deut. 28:12). In this overall literary, theological, and historical context, it is clear that Israel would share common ancestors and would have a sufficient increase in numbers to be considered a nation. It would have a common place of habitation and a common origin, not only in flesh and blood, but in their religious heritage. It would share a common history, culture, society, religious worship, and purposes for the present and the future.

This noun is used to mean nations other than Israel as well; pagan, Gentile, or heathen nations (Exo. 9:24; 34:10; Eze. 5:6-8), for all the earth and all the nations belong to God (cf. Exo. 19:5). Israel was to keep herself from the false religions, unclean practices, and views of these nations (Ezra 6:21). In the plural, the noun may indicate the generic humankind (Isa. 42:6). In a few instances, the word refers to a group of people rather than to a nation (2Kgs. 6:18; Psm. 43:1; Isa. 26:2), although the exact translation is difficult in these cases.

The word is used in a figurative sense to refer to animals or insects, such as in Joel1:6 where it depicts locusts.

round about...

מִן

min, מִנִּי

minniy, מִנֵּי

minnēy

A preposition used to indicate from, out of, away from; more than: after, since; immediately; because of, since so that; without; direction as southward, etc.). Its spelling varies according to its location and usage. Its basic meaning is from, away from, out of. Its basic meanings only can be noted here, but its exact meaning is easily discerned from its context: (1) With verbs, it expresses separation spatially or figuratively (Exo. 19:14; Deut. 22:8; Jos. 10:7). It can be used with a verb not indicating separation, e.g., to stay away from strife (Prov. 20:3; Isa. 14:19). (2) With the basic sense of out of, from (Gen. 3:22-24; 4:10; 34:26; Exo. 2:10; 8:9; 5; Jdg. 15:7; Psm. 40:2, 3), it often indicates what something is made of or formed from (Gen. 2:19; Hos. 13:2). With a pronominal suffix meaning from it, it means of one piece with it (Exo. 25:19, 25:31). It indicates a cause for something, on account of, because (Exo. 2:23; 6:9; 1Kgs. 14:4; Prov. 20:4; Isa. 53:5). (3) It is used to mean something is a part of something else, a part or share of it (Gen. 6:19; 7:8; 39:11; Num. 16:2). It indicates some of in an indefinite sense (Exo. 16:27; Lev. 25:49; Psm. 137:3). When repeated it means some . . . others or its equivalent expression (1Chr. 9:28-29). (4) It is used to mark time: from, since (Deut. 9:24), from a certain day or time (Lev. 22:27; Num. 15:23; 1Sam. 18:9). It is used in phrases to mean from ancient times, antiquity (Hab. 1:12); from of old (Isa. 42:14). It indicates right after a certain time (Gen. 38:24; Jos. 23:1; Eze. 38:8). (5) Paired with ‛aḏ (H5704) it usually means from . . . even to, as far as (Gen. 10:19; 15:18; Exo. 11:7; Jer. 51:62). In a figurative sense, this same construction can mean e.g., from young . . . to old, both inclusive (Gen. 19:4; 1Sam. 5:9; Jer. 6:13). (6) It may further indicate than, in comparisons (Lev. 21:10; Jdg. 14:18). (7) Prefixed to an infinitive, it is often translated as from (Gen. 16:2); a few times as on account of or because (Deut. 7:7-8); or temporally as since or after (Num. 24:23; Isa. 44:7). (8) It is often attached to other words in compounds and is sometimes used in front of infinitives of verbs: e.g., with ‛āḇaḏ (H5647) meaning from serving (Exo. 14:5); with bāla‛ (H1104) meaning from destroying (Lam. 2:8). (9) It is used in front of a verb form once as a conjunction indicating a negative purpose, that . . . not (Deut. 33:11). Other uses almost always fall under one of the above categories.

This is the same battle where 2/3 of Gog in the land of Magog will die in battle. So many die in this battle, that people on the Mediterranean Sea must put clothes pins on their noses to stop the death odor. All Israel will be 7 months burying the dead.

Eze. 39:12 "And seven months shall the house of Israel be burying of them, that they may cleanse the land."

This plainly says that the deaths in this great battle are a judgment of God against the heathen people.



The Lord Himself now repeated the summons of the preceding verses, instructing the nations to enter the Valley of Jehoshaphat (cf. Joel 3:2). Employing agricultural imagery, He then commanded His warriors to destroy His enemies.

Book of 1 John Chapter 4 Vs. 1

 

Test the Spirits



1 John 4:1 "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world."

Beloved of course, is speaking to Christians then and now. There has never been a time in history when there were more strange doctrines being taught than right now. It is the obligation of believers to determine for themselves, whether the message being taught is of God or not.


Beloved... Greek: agapetos, dearly beloved: worthy of love. Translated beloved 47 times (1Jhn. 4:1, 4:7, 4:11; Mat. 3:17; 12:18; Rom. 1:7; Jude 1:3; etc.); well-beloved (Mat. 12:6; Rom. 16:5; 3Jhn. 1:1); dearly beloved (Rom. 12:19; 1Cor. 10:14; etc.); and dear (Eph. 5:1; Col. 1:7; 1Thes. 2:8).

Again the recognition of danger from false spirits prompts this affectionate address.

believe not every... The mention of the Holy Spirit in 3:24 prompts John to inform his readers that other spirits exist, i.e., demonic spirits, who produce false prophets and false teachers to propagate their false doctrines.

Spirit... Greek: pneuma, the equivalent to the Hebrew: ruwach. Pneuma is used 385 times in the New Testament.

Pneuma Is Used of:

1. God as Spirit (John 4:24; 2Cor. 3:17)

2. Christ (1Cor. 6:17; 15:45)

3. The Holy Spirit (Mat. 1:18, 1:20; 3:11, 3:16—altogether of Him over 240 times)

4. Christ’s personal spirit (Mark 2:8; 8:12; Luke 2:40; John 11:33; 19:30)

5. Angels (Heb. 1:7, 1:14; Psm. 104:4)

6. Spirits of men (Mat. 5:3; 1Cor. 2:11; 6:20; 1Thes. 5:23; Heb. 4:12; 12:23)

7. Evil spirits (Mat. 8:16; 10:1; 12:43; Acts 8:7; 16:16; Rev. 16:13; 18:2)

8. The resurrection body (1Cor. 15:44).

Christians are to have a healthy skepticism regarding any teaching, unlike some among Johns congregations who were too open minded to anyone claiming a new teaching regarding the faith. Christians are to be like the Bereans who, as students of the Word, examined the Scriptures to determine truth and error (Acts 17:10-12).

but try the... or test is a metallurgist's term used for assaying metals to determine their purity and value. Christians must test any teaching with a view to approving or disapproving it rigorously comparing any teaching to the Scripture.

try... Greek: dokimazo, test. Translated try (1Cor. 3:13; 1Thes. 2:4; 1Pet. 1:7; 1Jhn. 4:1); prove (Luke 14:19; Rom. 12:2; 2Cor. 8:8, 8:22; 13:5; Gal. 6:4; Eph. 5:10; 1Thes. 5:21; 1Tim. 3:10; Heb. 3:9); examine (1Cor. 11:28); discern (Luke 12:56); approve (Rom. 2:18; 1Cor. 16:3; Phlp. 1:10); allow (Rom. 14:22; 1Thes. 2:4); and like (Rom. 1:28). The reason here given is because of many false teachers going abroad.

try (δοκιμάζετε)

Better, as Rev., prove. See on 1Pet. 1:7; see on Luke 12:55. Compare the phrase discerning of spirits, 1Cor. 12:10.

Seven Ways to Test False Prophets:

1. By their confession of Jesus (1Jhn. 4:2-3)

2. Their relationship with the world (1Jhn. 4:5; 2:15-17; Jas. 4:4)

3. How they receive Christianity (1Jhn. 4:6)

4. Their attitude toward the commandments of God (1Jhn. 4:6; 3:20-24; John 14:15)

5. Love of the brethren (1Jhn. 4:7-21; 3:11-16; John 13:34-35; 15:12-15)

6. The indwelling Holy Spirit (1Jhn. 4:4-6)

7. The Word of God (1Jhn. 4:6; 5:10; 2Tim. 3:16; 2Cor. 4:4)

the spirits… By juxtaposing spirits with false prophets John reminds his readers that behind human teachers who propagate false doctrine and error are demons inspired by Satan. Human false prophets and teachers are the physical expressions of demonic, spiritual sources

(Mat. 7:15; Mark 13:22).

The only way for us to be qualified to judge the message is to know

the Bible. We must search the Scriptures diligently to know the

truth. The devil is a counterfeit. The false messages being brought

forth are very close to truth. They just change a word here and there

and change the meaning.

of God (ἐκ)

Out of proceeding from.

One of the most recent tricks being brought forth by the devil in the church, is a watering down of Jesus to where He is not God. Another terrible teaching that is making the rounds is that Jesus did not become God, until He rose from the grave. This is blasphemy.

Jesus was the Word of God in heaven. He was there from the

beginning. He is the Eternal One. He is Alpha and Omega, the

Beginning and the End. He is Eternal God the Word. To teach that

the devil, or his demons, ever had any control over Jesus is also a lie.

Jesus was not forced to die on the cross. He gave His life willingly.



false prophets (ψευδοπροφῆται)

The term is applied in the New Testament to rivals of true prophets under the old dispensation (Luke 6:26; 2Pet. 2:1), and to rivals of the apostles under the gospel economy (Mat. 7:15; 24:11, 24:24; Mark 13:22). In Revelation to the embodied power of spiritual falsehood (Rev. 16:13; 19:20; 20:10). The false prophet supports his claims by signs and portents (Mat. 24:24; Acts 13:6; Rev. 19:20) and is thus distinguished from the false teacher. See 2Pet. 2:1, where the two terms occur together.


Christ's flesh was the only thing that died on the cross. From the cross, He dismissed His Spirit from His body and commanded it to go to the Father. Jesus was Eternal Spirit in the body of flesh. Anyone who believes Jesus to be less than God is teaching a false doctrine.

are gone out (ἐξαληλύθασιν)

The perfect tense indicates that the influence of their going out on their false mission is in operation at the present.

Don't trust every spirit. On the contrary, test the spirits to see whether they are from God (compare 1Thes. 5:19-22). This is an important principle for our age. After years of having lost touch with the spiritual realm altogether, many people are rediscovering it but have not the discernment to know which spirits are from God. Not every inner voice or feeling is from God. Some are merely from us, either consequences of being overtired or overwrought, or expressions of our own wishes and fears. Others are truly from the spiritual realm, but, unfortunately, from Satan and his demons, not from God and his angels. By the same token, not every prophet or religious teacher is from God; yet some are.

1Jhn. 4:2-3 give one criterion by which to test the spirits. Another is that spirits from God can be expected to give wholehearted support to everything the Bible says.

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

Book of Matthew Chapter 1 Vs. 2, 3

 

The Genealogy of Jesus Christ



Mat 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;

Mat 1:3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;


Tamar... Rachav ... Rut ... the wife of Uriyah (Bat-sheva)... Miryam. Women, especially those born Gentiles, were rarely included in biblical genealogies. The first four were Gentile women whom God honored by including them among the recorded ancestors of Yeshua the Jewish Messiah-through whom Gentiles, women and slaves are saved equally with Jews, men and free (Gal. 3:28). On whether these women became Jews or continued to be Gentiles see Acts 16:1. He was the son of a Jewish woman and therefore a Jew, not a Gentile. Many Christians suppose he was a Gentile for at least these two reasons: (1) At Num. 1:2 God calls for a census of Israel by their families, by their fathers' houses. (2) The genealogies in the Tanakh always mention the men and only rarely the women.

Nevertheless, while legal responsibilities and entitlements are passed from father to son (see Mat. 1:1 on Son of and Son of Avraham, Mat. 1:24-25, Luke 3:23-38), Jewish and non-Jewish descent are invariably traced through the mother, not the father. The child of a Jewish mother and a Gentile father is Jewish, the child of a Gentile mother and a Jewish father is Gentile. If a Gentile woman converts to Judaism, she is a Jew, and her subsequent children are likewise Jewish. The questions for us are, first, whether this was the case in the first century, and, second, even if it was, is it authorized biblically?

In his interesting book, Who Was A Jew?-Rabbinic and Halakhic Perspectives on the Jewish Christian Schism (Hoboken, New Jersey: Ktav Publishing House, Inc., 1985), Lawrence H. Schiffman has a chapter, The Jew By Birth, in which he dates matrilineal Jewish descent to at least the second and probably the first century C.E., adducing as evidence Mishna Kiddushin 3:12, Tosefta Kiddushin 4:16, and Josephus. Among the supportive biblical passages is Ezra 10:2-3:

And Shechanyah... answered Ezra, 'We have trespassed against our God and taken foreign wives from the people living in the Land .... So, let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives and such as are born to them ....' "

The phrase, and such as are born to them, implies that the children of Jewish fathers and Gentile mothers are Gentiles and not Jews; otherwise, they would not be excluded from the Jewish people in this covenant. Oved, the son of Bo'az and Ruth the Moabitess, is Jewish not because of his father Bo'az but because Ruth became Jewish first, not by some formal conversion process (there was none at the time) but with her confession, "Your people shall be my people and your God my God" (Ruth 1:16; 4:9-10, 4:21-22). Schiffman discusses these and other relevant biblical passages, concluding that inheriting Jewishness and non-Jewishness through the mother goes back as far as the mid-fifth century B.C.E. (Who Was a Jew? p. 16). In other words, the practice is biblical.

Former Chief Rabbi of Israel Shlomo Goren gives evidence that not only is it biblical but many centuries older; see his article on pp. 32-37 in Baruch Litvin, compiler, and Sidney B. Hoenig, editor, Jewish Identity: Modern Responsa and Opinions on the Registration of Children of Mixed Marriages (Jerusalem & New York: Feldheim Publishers, 1970).

The importance of tracing Jewishness through the mother increased when Jewish life became disrupted and Jewish families were broken apart by conquerors and persecutors. The rabbis reasoned, first, that where Jewish women were being abused it might be impossible to determine who the father was and therefore whether he was Jewish; and, second, that since a child's loyalties are often determined by the mother because she spends more time with him, a child raised by a Jewish mother and a Gentile father is more likely to be brought up loyal to Judaism than the child of a Jewish father and a Gentile mother who will not give him the early training that builds such devotion.

The conclusion that Timothy was a Jew and not a Gentile is important for understanding Acts 16:3.

Timothy was the son of a Jewish woman and a Greek father. Since exogamy violates Jewish law, an explanation is called for, although any conclusion must be a conjecture. I think the most likely reason for Timothy's mixed parentage is that Timothy's mother, Eunice (2Tim. 1:5), like many Jews today, was assimilated into the dominant Gentile culture around her and simply did not observe halakhah. Before coming to New Covenant faith, she married a non-Jew, but afterwards her pagan and non-believing husband left or died; whereupon she raised her son in the faith from childhood (2Tim. 3:15). Possibly she and Timothy went to live with her Messianic Jewish mother Lois (2Tim. 1:5).

Many Messianic Jews like to say that believing in Yeshua makes us even more Jewish. One result, in some cases, is that we become more attentive to Jewish laws and customs. But if the above explanation of why Timothy's father was Gentile is correct, it is clear that coming to faith did not make Eunice more observant. For if she had been observant, she would have seen to it herself that her son got circumcised. In Judaism the responsibility for circumcising a Jewish boy rest with his Jewish father but not, of course, with a Gentile father. If the father is unwilling or, as in this case, unable to take responsibility for his son's circumcision, the beit-din Jewish religious court sees to it, acting on behalf of the Jewish community as a whole. If a boy has not been circumcised by the time he reaches thirteen, bar-mitzvah age, the obligation to get circumcised becomes his own. While the mother is not directly accountable for her son's circumcision, nothing prevents her from urging the boy's father or the beit-din to act. Unlike Moses' wife Zipporah (Exo. 4:25), Eunice did not take this responsibility on herself, which is why Timothy was still uncircumcised when Sha'ul arrived on the scene, so that he, himself an observant Jew (see Act_13:9), acted in loco patris (Acts 16:3).

Here are other possible reasons, likewise speculative, why Timothy had a Jewish mother and a Gentile father:

(1) It was not a marriage but the rape of an observant Jewish woman. This is not impossible, given the antisemitism and level of violence in ancient Roman society. This explanation has appeal for Messianic Jews who would like to paint a picture of every Jewish believer as Torah-true and gloss over the fact that the Gospel has appeal for assimilated Jews too.

(2) Eunice came to faith before her marriage and therefore considered herself no longer Jewish but Christian, therefore not subject to the Torah, so that she had no scruples about marrying outside her people. Those who think accepting Yeshua decreases Jewish loyalty or frees a Jew from the Law might prefer this explanation, but the New Testament evidence is against it. Jews who accepted Yeshua as the Messiah did not suddenly consider themselves ex-Jews; everything in the book of Acts demonstrates exactly the opposite. Moreover, accepting Yeshua as the Jewish Messiah does not free a Jew from the Law; this point is made in numerous notes in this commentary. A different point: although there is no specific evidence that the teaching had yet been promulgated, we know that believers in Yeshua were encouraged to marry other believers (1Cor. 7:39).

(3) She simply fell in love with the man. But this explanation reflects twentieth-century fantasy, not first-century reality.

Phares... See 1Chr. 2:4-12; Ruth 4:13-22 for the names of Phares to Jesse (Mat. 1:3-5).

Thamar... Four women in this genealogy. Rahab and Ruth were Gentiles. Tamar and Bathsheba were Jews. Thus Christ descended from both Jews and Gentiles. Rahab was a harlot (Jas. 2:25). Both Tamar and Bathsheba committed adultery (Gen. 38:1-30; 2Sam. 11:1-5). Ruth was a pure woman (Ruth. 3:11).

begat... Greek: gennao. When used of the father it means to beget or engender. When used of the mother it means to bring forth. Translated be born (Mat. 1:16); conceive (Mat. 1:20); gender (Gal. 4:24); and bear (Luke 1:13).

In this list of names, the patriarchs, Gentiles, women of doubtful character, good men and bad men, the wise, the illustrious, the unknown-all supply important links. It is as though to teach us that in the Son of man there is a blending of all classes, that He might be the representative and helper of all. Each of us may find some point of contact in this genealogy. Jesus Christ belongs to our race. He knew what was in man by that subtle and intimate knowledge which comes of kinship. In Him, therefore, is neither Jew nor Greek exclusively, but all are one in Him.